Skip to main content

Table 6 Comparison of number of positive responsesa between CC + PMV and CCb

From: The willingness of final year medical and dental students to perform bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation in an Asian community

If the victim is CC + PMV CC P value
A family member 202 (99.5%) 202 (99.5%) 1.0
A close friend 202 (99.5%) 201 (99.0%) > 0.95
A stranger of different gender 189 (93.1%) 193 (95.1%) 0.424
A stranger of different race 187 (92.1%) 192 (94.6%) 0.359
A stranger of different gender and race 177 (87.2%) 192 (94.6%) 0.004
A stranger sustaining facial trauma 141 (69.5%) 181 (89.2%) < 0.001
A stranger who is a child 195 (96.1%) 196 (96.6%) > 0.95
A stranger who is elderly 183 (90.1%) 190 (93.6%) 0.143
An unkempt stranger 103 (50.7%) 162 (79.8%) < 0.001
A person with whom you have a personal dispute 167 (82.3%) 187 (92.1%) < 0.001
  1. aPositive responses are recoded from the variables “definitely yes” and “probably yes”
  2. bThe McNemar test was used for the analysis of these two dependent categorical variables
  3. CC + PMV chest compressions and mouth-to-mouth ventilation, CC chest compressions only