Skip to main content

Table 2 Adult emergency department (ED) visits in index (2012) and subsequent years (2013, 2014) in Texas Medicaid

From: Variation in outpatient emergency department utilization in Texas Medicaid: a state-level framework for finding “superutilizers”

 

Number of ED visits in index year (2012)a

  

Range of potential overutilization

      

EFb

1

2

3–4

5–6

7–9

10–14

15+

All

Annualized ED visits, index year

2.43

3.71

5.03

7.07

9.69

13.78

27.47

3.94

Annualized ED visits, 1 year after

0.91

1.42

2.21

3.49

5.28

8.03

16.36

1.72

Annualized ED visits, 2 years after

0.74

1.15

1.73

2.78

4.00

5.94

11.46

1.35

Number of ED providers, index yearc

1.00

1.34

1.65

2.01

2.39

2.88

4.26

1.32

Primary diagnosis, visits in index yeard (%)

 Chronic condition

3.79

4.04

4.39

5.05

5.76

6.49

9.73

5.02

 Substance use disorder

0.62

0.61

0.71

0.76

1.02

1.14

1.33

0.79

 Mental illness

2.00

2.12

2.37

2.66

3.16

3.55

4.15

2.59

Diagnoses 1–3, visits in index yeare (%)

 Substance use disorder

7.03

7.43

8.17

8.97

9.82

10.47

10.73

8.41

 Mental illness

5.33

5.93

6.87

7.99

9.25

10.71

11.74

7.40

NYU algorithm preventable eventsf (%)

 Injury

14.07

13.02

12.60

12.51

12.92

13.04

12.16

13.01

 Non-emergent

24.92

25.28

26.00

26.00

25.29

25.09

22.21

25.16

 Emergent, primary care treatable

22.53

23.04

22.79

22.64

22.38

22.18

23.14

22.72

 Emergent, preventable, or avoidable

5.12

5.34

5.62

6.02

6.21

6.12

5.94

5.62

 Emergent, not preventable, or avoidable

12.66

12.63

12.18

12.01

12.13

12.65

15.53

12.67

Frequent users, index year and 2 years after (%)

 3+ visits each year

NA

NA

10.98

21.68

34.07

47.04

60.24

5.01

 5+ visits each year

NA

NA

NA

9.29

19.68

32.42

50.47

1.91

Enrolled in Medicaid in the subsequent 2 years

51.00

57.34

63.03

68.89

72.25

75.99

76.05

56.42

  1. Authors’ analysis of Texas Medicaid claims, encounter, and enrollment data. This analysis excludes dual-eligible enrollees
  2. NA not applicable
  3. aThe index year is set to 2012 to provide a 2-year prospective window
  4. bExtremely frequent ED users
  5. cCalculated using the total number of unique national provide identifier (NPI) numbers; unique NPIs, however, may be attributed to facilities or physicians
  6. dThe ICD-9-CM codes used to define chronic condition, SUD, and mental illness were provided by Billings and Raven [7]
  7. eIncludes primary, secondary, and tertiary diagnoses
  8. fThe NYU ED profiling algorithm is used here