Skip to main content

Table 3 Unadjusted associations of intubation method with intubation outcomes

From: The effectiveness of rapid sequence intubation (RSI) versus non-RSI in emergency department: an analysis of multicenter prospective observational study

n (%, 95% CI)

Success on 1st attempt

Success ≤2nd attempt

Complicationa

Major complicationb

RSI

(n = 761 on 1st attempt,

n = 760 ≤ 2nd attempt)

553

(73%, 69–76%)

687

(90%, 88–92%)

93

(12%, 10–15%)

62

(8%, 6–10%)

Non-RSI

(n = 1604 on 1st attempt,

n = 1557 ≤ 2nd attempt)

1003

(63%, 60–65%)

1348

(87%, 85–88%)

209

(13%, 11–15%)

122

(8%, 6–9%)

Intubation with sedative agent only

(n = 871 on 1st attempt,

n = 849 ≤ 2nd attempt)

542

(62%, 59–65%)

724

(85%, 83–88%)

121

(14%, 12–16%)

72

(8%, 7–10%)

Intubation without medications

(n = 729 on 1st attempt,

n = 706 ≤ 2nd attempt)

460

(63%, 60–66%)

622

(88%, 86 –90%)

86

(12%, 10–14%)

50

(7%, 5–9%)

  1. Abbreviation: RSI rapid sequence intubation, CI confidence interval
  2. aDefined as cardiac arrest, hypotension, hypoxemia, regurgitation, esophageal intubation with delayed recognition, main stem bronchial intubation, dental or lip trauma, airway trauma, or allergic reaction
  3. bDefined as cardiac arrest, hypotension, hypoxemia, regurgitation, or esophageal intubation with delayed recognition