Skip to main content

Table 3 Weight estimation meta-analysis summary data, showing both fixed effects (FE) and random effects (RE) data

From: The accuracy of emergency weight estimation systems in children—a systematic review and meta-analysis

  

Random effects outcomes

Fixed effects outcomes

  

MPE

LLOA

ULOA

Studies

N

PW10

PW20

Studies

N

MPE

LLOA

ULOA

Studies

N

PW10

PW20

Studies

N

APLS (new)

All

5.1

−42.5

52.6

8

19,029

33.6

56.1

13

49,709

6.1

−44.1

56.2

8

19,029

28.3

58.8

13

49,709

APLS (new)

HIC

1.5

−49.7

52.8

5

17,318

33.7

56.1

9

46,709

5.8

−44.7

56.3

5

17,318

28.0

58.8

9

46,709

APLS (new)

LMIC

10.9

−30.4

52.3

3

1711

33.4

50.6

4

3000

9.1

−37.2

55.4

3

1711

33.8

56.9

4

3000

ARC

All

−2.3

−41.6

37.1

6

6334

35.9

64.2

7

7405

−8.3

−50.5

33.8

6

6334

35.9

65.3

7

7405

ARC

HIC

−13.1

−49.3

23.2

3

4572

35.1

66.7

3

4572

−13.4

−50.1

23.2

3

4572

34.3

64.9

3

4572

ARC

LMIC

8.6

−34.0

51.1

3

1762

36.5

62.4

4

2833

4.9

−39.4

49.2

3

1762

38.6

65.9

4

2833

Argall formula

All

4.9

−43.0

52.8

7

145,823

31.5

51.1

10

147,341

−4.7

−47.3

37.9

7

145,823

38.7

63.1

10

147,341

Argall formula

HIC

−1.3

−47.4

44.7

5

144,691

34.7

54.3

7

145,257

−4.8

−47.2

37.6

5

144,691

38.9

63.2

7

145,257

Argall formula

LMIC

20.5

−32.1

73.1

2

1132

24.1

46.8

3

2084

14.3

−37.4

66.1

2

1132

28.4

54.1

3

2084

Best Guess formula

All

12.0

−32.4

56.3

13

284,798

33.8

58.2

18

324,035

5.8

−35.2

46.8

13

284,798

39.2

65.1

18

324,035

Best Guess formula

HIC

6.8

−35.7

49.3

9

277,790

37.7

63.5

14

318,478

5.5

−35.2

46.1

9

277,790

39.5

65.3

14

318,478

Best Guess formula

LMIC

23.6

−24.9

72.1

4

7008

20.2

46.4

4

5557

19.3

−25.5

64.1

4

7008

21.9

58.5

4

5557

CAWR-1

All

−3.3

−45.4

38.9

4

9064

34.6

65.7

5

10,016

−5.2

−48.2

37.7

4

9064

34.4

65.2

5

10,016

CAWR-1

HIC

−5.6

−47.1

35.9

3

8101

34.1

68.1

3

8101

−6.3

−48.6

36.0

3

8101

34.2

65.9

3

8101

CAWR-1

LMIC

3.9

−40.4

48.2

1

963

35.5

62.0

2

1915

3.9

−40.4

48.2

1

963

35.5

62.0

2

1915

CAWR-2

All

1.2

−38.6

40.9

3

4384

41.4

76.2

3

4384

−1.0

−42.1

40.0

3

4384

42.2

76.3

3

4384

CAWR-2

HIC

−2.2

−41.2

36.8

2

3501

41.7

79.0

2

3501

−3.3

−43.1

36.5

2

3501

42.6

77.7

2

3501

CAWR-2

LMIC

7.9

−33.3

49.1

1

883

40.7

70.8

1

883

7.9

−33.3

49.1

1

883

40.7

70.8

1

883

EPLS formula

All

−9.1

−48.8

30.6

27

351,449

35.9

63.0

36

190,580

−14.2

−56.1

27.7

27

351,449

33.8

56.6

36

190,580

EPLS formula

HIC

−13.1

−53.1

26.9

20

344,221

34.7

61.0

27

185,925

−14.5

−56.4

27.4

20

344,221

33.5

56.0

27

185,925

EPLS formula

LMIC

2.3

−36.4

40.9

7

7228

39.7

68.0

9

4655

−1.9

−39.1

35.2

7

7228

46.3

71.8

9

4655

Garwood formula

All

11.8

−38.9

62.5

2

1390

31.8

58.3

3

2461

10.7

−38.3

59.6

2

1390

30.6

57.3

3

2461

Garwood formula

HIC

9.2

−36.5

54.9

1

996

35.3

65.9

1

996

9.2

−36.5

54.9

1

996

35.3

65.9

1

996

Garwood formula

LMIC

14.4

−41.3

70.1

1

394

30.1

54.5

2

1465

14.4

−41.3

70.1

1

394

27.5

51.5

2

1465

Leffler formula

All

0.6

−42.8

44.0

10

270,349

32.6

57.4

11

271,373

−1.5

−40.1

37.2

10

270,349

43.8

69.3

11

271,373

Leffler formula

HIC

−3.7

−45.6

38.2

8

269,130

35.9

62.0

8

269,130

−1.5

−40.1

37.0

8

269,130

43.9

69.5

8

269,130

Leffler formula

LMIC

17.8

−31.6

67.1

2

1219

23.7

45.2

3

2243

11.8

−36.7

60.3

2

1219

27.8

52.3

3

2243

Luscombe formula

All

8.2

−34.5

50.9

15

237,568

34.0

58.1

21

275,841

0.4

−41.5

42.4

15

237,568

38.7

67.1

21

275,841

Luscombe formula

HIC

4.7

−36.3

45.8

11

231,881

38.3

64.7

15

269,554

0.2

−41.6

41.9

11

231,881

39.0

68.0

15

269,554

Luscombe formula

LMIC

17.7

−29.5

65.0

4

5687

23.1

46.2

6

6287

11.8

−33.7

57.2

4

5687

27.1

54.2

6

6287

Nelson formula

All

4.7

−33.6

42.9

9

134,315

36.8

61.9

10

135,339

−9.1

−38.6

20.5

9

134,315

42.0

73.7

10

135,339

Nelson formula

HIC

−6.7

−39.3

25.9

4

128,844

36.6

59.7

5

129,173

−9.8

−38.0

18.3

4

128,844

42.1

73.9

5

129,173

Nelson formula

LMIC

13.8

−29.0

56.5

5

5471

37.0

63.7

5

6166

8.9

−30.3

48.0

5

5471

40.9

70.1

5

6166

Park formula

All

5.9

−35.4

47.2

2

125,170

36.9

64.3

4

126,788

1.0

−34.8

36.8

2

125,170

41.5

72.4

4

126,788

Park formula

HIC

0.9

−34.8

36.6

1

124,095

43.4

74.2

2

124,332

0.9

−34.8

36.6

1

124,095

41.7

72.8

2

124,332

Park formula

LMIC

10.9

−35.9

57.7

1

1075

30.5

54.5

2

2456

10.9

−35.9

57.7

1

1075

29.4

53.0

2

2456

Shann formula

All

−2.7

−49.1

43.8

7

107,890

35.8

60.5

9

111,266

−8.5

−41.9

24.9

7

107,890

40.2

70.9

9

111,266

Shann formula

HIC

−8.3

−53.2

36.5

4

106,150

37.2

62.1

5

108,455

−8.7

−41.6

24.3

4

106,150

40.3

71.1

5

108,455

Shann formula

LMIC

4.9

−43.7

53.5

3

1740

34.1

58.9

4

2811

3.4

−45.5

52.2

3

1740

35.5

61.2

4

2811

Theron formula

All

33.2

−47.9

114.2

5

4606

17.6

38.4

8

6362

29.4

−65.2

124.0

5

4606

18.8

13.5

8

6362

Theron formula

HIC

28.4

−54.5

111.3

3

3272

20.0

44.6

4

3577

27.8

−73.0

128.6

3

3272

18.8

13.5

4

3577

Theron formula

LMIC

40.3

−38.0

118.6

2

1334

15.2

32.2

4

2785

33.3

−43.7

110.4

2

1334

18.7

13.5

4

2785

Parental estimate

All

−3.6

−27.3

20.2

3

561

69.8

87.1

10

3070

−3.2

−24.9

18.4

3

561

78.1

89.8

10

3070

Parental estimate

HIC

−3.6

−27.3

20.2

3

561

68.0

87.1

9

2475

−3.2

−24.9

18.4

3

561

76.4

89.8

9

2475

Parental estimate

LMIC

   

0

 

85.2

 

1

595

   

0

 

85.2

595

1

 

Healthcare provider guesses

All

−2.5

−51.7

46.8

3

547

35.6

59.3

5

1719

−2.8

−49.1

43.4

3

547

40.3

58.1

5

1719

Healthcare provider guesses

HIC

−2.5

−51.7

46.8

3

547

35.6

59.3

5

1719

−2.8

−49.1

43.4

3

547

40.3

58.1

5

1719

Healthcare provider guesses

LMIC

   

0

   

0

    

0

   

0

 

Finger counting

All

   

0

 

53.8

83.4

2

4385

0.1

−34.0

34.2

0

4178

49.1

80.0

2

4385

Finger counting

HIC

   

0

 

53.8

83.4

2

4385

0.1

−34.0

34.2

0

4178

49.1

80.0

2

4385

Finger counting

LMIC

   

0

   

0

 

0.1

−34.0

34.2

0

4178

  

0

 

Traub-Johnson formula

All

−0.8

−29.5

27.9

4

3561

45.9

74.8

4

3561

−3.2

−34.3

27.9

4

3561

48.8

75.2

4

3561

Traub-Johnson formula

HIC

−7.1

−35.9

21.7

2

2126

46.6

74.9

2

2126

−7.1

−37.4

23.2

2

2126

45.7

71.3

2

2126

Traub-Johnson formula

LMIC

5.5

−23.2

34.1

2

1435

45.2

74.7

2

1435

2.6

−26.4

31.5

2

1435

53.4

81.1

2

1435

Traub-Kichen formula

All

−2.0

−31.0

27.1

4

3455

45.4

74.4

4

3455

−4.8

−36.5

26.8

4

3455

48.5

74.4

4

3455

Traub-Kichen formula

HIC

−8.5

−38.2

21.2

2

2121

45.5

72.9

2

2121

−9.1

−39.8

21.6

2

2121

45.4

69.6

2

2121

Traub-Kichen formula

LMIC

4.6

−23.8

33.0

2

1334

45.3

75.9

2

1334

2.0

−26.4

30.4

2

1334

53.6

82.1

2

1334

MAC formula

All

6.7

−23.3

36.6

4

458,019

29.6

52.8

6

459,120

4.6

−16.0

25.3

4

458,019

28.0

58.0

6

459,120

MAC formula

HIC

7.4

−25.8

40.5

3

4029

29.3

51.5

4

4353

9.7

−29.4

48.9

3

4029

34.0

60.4

4

4353

MAC formula

LMIC

4.6

−15.8

25.0

1

453,990

30.1

58.0

2

454,767

4.6

−15.8

25.0

1

453,990

27.9

58.0

2

454,767

DWEM

All

−1.1

−26.3

24.1

2

884

57.8

87.6

3

1142

−0.9

−26.2

24.4

2

884

57.7

88.0

3

1142

DWEM

HIC

−1.1

−26.3

24.1

2

884

57.8

87.6

3

1142

−0.9

−26.2

24.4

2

884

57.7

88.0

3

1142

DWEM

LMIC

   

0

   

0

    

0

   

0

 

PAWPER tape

All

−0.2

−16.3

16.0

5

15,913

78.0

96.6

7

15,159

−1.0

−18.4

16.4

5

15,913

81.3

97.8

7

15,159

PAWPER tape

HIC

−0.8

−19.3

17.7

3

15,160

73.8

95.2

5

14,406

−1.0

−18.7

16.6

3

15,160

80.9

97.8

5

14,406

PAWPER tape

LMIC

0.8

−11.8

13.4

2

753

88.6

98.6

2

753

0.6

−12.0

13.3

2

753

88.7

98.7

2

753

Mercy method

All

−1.7

−19.5

16.2

8

5443

70.9

95.3

9

5642

−1.0

−19.7

17.7

8

5443

73.7

96.1

9

5642

Mercy method

HIC

−3.1

−20.9

14.8

5

4296

69.4

96.5

6

4495

−1.5

−20.2

17.1

5

4296

73.8

97.0

6

4495

Mercy method

LMIC

0.7

−17.2

18.7

3

1147

73.8

94.1

3

1147

0.9

−17.3

19.2

3

1147

73.2

93.6

3

1147

Wozniak method

All

−3.8

−36.1

28.5

2

628

72.1

 

2

 

−3.8

−36.3

28.6

2

628

74.9

 

2

1405

Wozniak method

HIC

   

0

   

0

    

0

   

0

 

Wozniak method

LMIC

−3.8

−36.1

28.5

2

628

72.1

 

2

 

−3.8

−36.3

28.6

2

628

74.9

 

2

1405

Broselow tape

All

−1.5

−29.1

26.2

36

625,559

55.6

81.2

53

779,711

2.1

−20.6

24.9

36

625,559

61.7

91.2

53

779,711

Broselow tape

HIC

−3.9

−32.0

24.2

25

164,714

56.7

83.4

41

316,853

−4.7

−27.9

18.6

25

164,714

60.2

91.4

41

316,853

Broselow tape

LMIC

4.4

−25.9

34.7

11

462,079

52.0

76.3

12

462,530

4.6

−16.0

25.2

11

462,079

62.7

78.5

12

462,530

  1. Data for the whole pooled sample as well as pooled data for high-income country (HIC) and low- and middle-income country (LMIC) populations are shown separately. There were very few substantial differences between the fixed effects and random effects analyses, which were not substantial enough to affect the overall outcomes. The number of studies in each pooled sample, as well as the number of data points is shown. A positive mean percentage error indicates an overestimation of weight, while a negative value indicates an underestimation of weight. Abbreviations: MPE mean percentage error, LLOA lower limit of agreement, ULOA upper limit of agreement, PW10 percentage of weight estimates within 10% of actual weight, PW20 percentage of weight estimates within 20% of actual weight