Characteristics | Biese et.al. 2014 [26] | Biese et.al. 2018 [27] |
---|---|---|
Setting, country | Academic center ED, USA | Academic center ED, USA |
Study design | RCT | RCT |
Aim(s) | To investigate whether an ED postdischarge telephone intervention by nurse improves discharge plan adherence. | To investigate whether an ED postdischarge telephone intervention by call-center nurse decreases ED return visit rates, hospitalization or death within 30 days after ED visit. |
Study period | From September 5 until November 9, 2010 | From August 2013 to March 2016 |
Study patients | Patients ≥65 years, discharged home from ED | Patients ≥65 years, discharged home from ED |
Recruitment of study patients | Randomization before first call Recruitment by telephone after mental cognition screening examination was passed and informed consent was obtained. | Recruitment by telephone after mental cognition screening examination was passed and informed consent was obtained. Subsequent randomization. |
Description of intervention: intervention group | Telephone call following pre-written script from trained study nurse within 1–3 days after ED discharge to review discharge instructions and offer assistance with discharge plan compliance. | Telephone call following pre-written script from call-center nurse within 1–3 days after ED discharge to identify problems, review discharge instructions and offer assistance with discharge plan compliance, advice if not feeling well. |
Description of intervention: control group(s) | Placebo group: scripted patient satisfaction survey telephone call from research assistant 1–3 days after ED discharge. Control group: no telephone intervention | Scripted patient satisfaction survey telephone call from call-center nurse 1–3 days after ED discharge. |
Sample size | Intervention group: n=39; placebo group: n=35; control group: n=46 | Intervention group: n=999; control group: n=1001 |
Outcome measures | Primary outcome measures: Scheduled physician appointment within 5 days. Filled medication prescription. Knowledge of name, dosage, indication of prescribed medication. | Primary outcome measures: Days from ED discharge to ED return visit, 30-day hospitalization or death. |
Secondary outcome measures: 35-day hospitalization 35-day ED return visits | Secondary outcome measures: Scheduled physician appointment within 30 days. Difficulty acquiring prescribed medication. | |
Results of outcome measures | Primary outcome measures: Physician appointment ≤ 5 days: 54% (I), 20% (P), 37%(C); p=0.04 Filled prescription: 96% (I), 94%(P), 94% (C); NS. Knowledge name/dosage of medication: 92%(I), 94%(P), 89%(C); NS. Knowledge of reason for medication: 96%(I), 100% (P), 100%(C); NS. | Primary outcome measures: ED return visits ≤30 days: 12.2% (I) vs. 12.5% (C); NS. Hospitalization ≤30 days: 9.0% (I) vs. 7.4%(C); NS. Death ≤30 days: 0%(I) vs. 0.51% (C); NS. |
Secondary outcome measures: ED return visits/hospitalization ≤35 days: 22%(I), 33%(P), 27%(C); NS. | Secondary outcome measures: Physician appointment ≤ 30 days: 80.8% (I) vs. 80.8%(C); NS. Difficulty acquiring medication: 15.5% (I) vs. 15.6%(C); NS. | |
Feasibility | 178 eligible patients: 120 (67%) included, 18 (10%) declined and 19 (11%) not reached during follow-up. 12 (7%) Were disqualified from primary outcome analysis, because of return to ED or other hospital setting within 5 days. Three were excluded for other reasons. Six had incomplete surveys. No patients failed mental screening examination. Inclusions only on Sunday, Monday, Tuesday, and not more than 9 inclusions per day. | Of the 6463 eligible patients, 2000 (31%) consented to participate. 2712 (42%) Patients were not reached, 1683 (45%) patients who were reached declined participation, 37 were lost on call back and 31 failed mental screening examination. Inclusions 24/7. |