Skip to main content
  • Educational Advances in Emergency Medicine
  • Open access
  • Published:

Evaluation of the World Health Organization—International Committee of the Red Cross Basic Emergency Care course for senior medical students

Abstract

Background

The Basic Emergency Care: Approach to the acutely ill and injured course was developed to train health care providers to recognize, stabilize, and treat critically ill patients in resource-limited settings. This study evaluates the Basic Emergency Care course as a tool for improving the emergency medicine knowledge and skills of medical students in a lower-middle income country.

Methods

This prospective study was conducted with senior medical students at the University of Nairobi School of Medicine in October 2021. Participants’ knowledge was assessed with multiple choice pre- and post-course examinations. Pre- and post-course surveys assessed participants’ confidence in managing acutely ill and injured patients using a 4-point Likert scale.

Results

A total of 30 students from the graduating medical school class participated in the study. Post-course examination scores (mean 94.5%, range 80–100%) showed a significant improvement (p < 0.05) compared to pre-course examination scores (mean 82%, range 64–96%). Participants’ comfort and confidence in providing emergency care and performing critical emergency skills significantly increased (p < 0.05) between the pre- and post-course surveys.

Conclusion

These findings suggest that the Basic Emergency Care course is effective in providing senior medical students with basic emergency medicine knowledge and increasing their confidence to identify and address life-threatening conditions prior to their intern year.

Background

Emergency medical conditions are responsible for over 28 million deaths annually with low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) bearing a disproportionate burden of morbidity and mortality [1,2,3]. Access to high quality emergency care has the potential to reduce this disparity, but many LMICs lack organized emergency medical systems and dedicated emergency medicine (EM) trained providers [3,4,5]. Specialized EM training programs are in the early stages of development in many LMICs, and emergency departments are often staffed by physicians who are not EM-trained [6, 7]. This contributes to shortcomings in triage and the early recognition and treatment of critically ill patients.

Many programs ranging from short interventions to full residency programs have been developed to train healthcare providers from LMICs in the delivery of emergency care [7]. The development of EM residency programs requires significant financial, political, and human resources [8,9,10]. However, short-duration EM courses offer a reasonable alternative to increase clinical knowledge, competency, and procedural skills of emergency care workers [11,12,13,14]. Both EM residency programs and short-duration EM interventions are associated with significant reductions in mortality [15, 16].

As EM residency programs are slow to expand in LMICs, short-duration EM training courses can provide a feasible, efficient, and cost-effective means to bridge the gap and provide health care workers with critical EM knowledge and skills. The Basic Emergency Care (BEC) course was developed by the World Health Organization (WHO) in collaboration with the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) and the International Federation for Emergency Medicine (IFEM) to train health care providers to manage acute illness and injury in resource-limited settings [17]. This open-access, 4 to 5-day course utilizes lectures, small group discussions, and skills stations to teach all levels of health care providers to recognize, stabilize, and manage critically ill and injured patients. It has been successfully piloted among clinical officers, assistant medical officers, medical officers, nurses, and nursing assistants in several LMICs [18, 19].

This study aims to evaluate the BEC course as a tool for improving the emergency medicine knowledge and skills of senior medical students in Kenya, a lower-middle income country. EM training courses in several LMICs have focused on medical students in an effort to increase the number of providers with EM knowledge and improve access to emergency medical care [20,21,22]. Kenyan medical students represent a unique target population because there is limited dedicated EM training in the medical school curriculum, and the majority of Kenyan physicians will work as general practitioners after completing a one-year internship [14, 23]. Therefore, offering the BEC course to senior medical students can potentially increase exposure to EM concepts and skills and expand the number of future physicians with EM training.

The first medical school in Kenya was established at the University of Nairobi in 1967 [24]. Undergraduate medical education consists of six years divided between pre-clinical courses and clinical rotations [14, 23]. Kenyan medical students have the opportunity to participate in a 2-day trauma course during their 6th year, but there are no other dedicated emergency medicine courses or rotations in the medical school curriculum [14]. After graduation, the new physicians complete 12-month internships at district hospitals throughout the country and rotate through internal medicine, surgery, pediatrics, obstetrics/gynecology, psychiatry, and community health departments [23]. Following internship, some physicians will pursue advanced specialized training, in the form of certificate, diploma, and Masters of Medicine programs, but the majority of Kenya physicians will work as general practitioners [23].

As the Kenyan Ministry of Health aims to prioritize emergency medical care [23], expanding access to focused EM training opportunities is crucial. Although the BEC course has been successful in other settings [18, 19], this course has not previously been evaluated in Kenya or among senior medical students. We hope to show that the BEC course can provide senior medical students with the emergency medicine knowledge and skills needed to care for acutely ill and injured patients.

Methods

This prospective study was conducted with senior medical students at the University of Nairobi School of Medicine in October 2021. A needs assessment was distributed to gauge confidence in managing emergency medicine cases and interest in participating in an emergency medicine training. Based on overwhelming interest in emergency medicine training, we proceeded with the BEC course.

Participants were recruited via an advertisement in the University of Nairobi School of Medicine Class of 2021 WhatsApp group [25]. Participants were selected on a continuous, first-come basis. All members of the graduating class at the University of Nairobi School of Medicine were eligible to participate. The course was capped at 30 participants according to African Federation for Emergency Medicine (AFEM) regulations [26].

The graduating medical students participated in the 5-day course which included lectures, small group discussions, and skills stations covering the ABCDE approach, trauma, difficulty in breathing, shock, and altered mental status. Participants’ knowledge was assessed with 25 question, multiple choice, pre- and post-course examinations. A pre- and post-course survey assessed participants’ confidence in managing acutely ill and injured patients using a 4-point Likert scale with responses ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 4 (strongly agree) and 1 (not confident at all) to 4 (very confident). The pre- and post- course surveys included both positive (i.e., I feel confident seeing very ill patients) and negative (i.e., I do not feel confident in my knowledge of emergency care) statements. The responses to the negative statements were not reversed to calculate the mean Likert scores. The pre- and post-course examinations and surveys were the standard versions developed as part of the BEC training package, which were obtained from the AFEM BEC coordinator [27]. These materials can be accessed upon request to AFEM [27].

De-identified participant data was prospectively collected during the course. Data were managed on a password-protected computer. Quantitative data from pre- and post-course examinations and surveys were compared using the paired two-sample t-test. All analysis was completed using the R statistics software [28].

Results

Demographics

A total of 30 students from the graduating class at the University of Nairobi School of Medicine participated in the BEC course. The mean age of the participants was 26.3 years, 63% were female, and 37% were male. All of the participants had recently completed medical school rotations at the time of the study, but they had not started their post-medical school internship. None of the participants had prior emergency medicine training or experience with the BEC course.

Pre- and post-tests

The pre- and post- course tests were completed by 30 participants. Post-course examination scores (mean 94.5, range 80–100) showed a significant improvement (p < 0.05) compared to pre-course examination scores (mean 82, range 64–96) (Table 1).

Table 1 Pre- and post-course test scores

Pre- and post-course surveys

The pre- and post- course tests were completed by 30 participants. However, three participants did not answer some of the pre-course survey questions and one participant excluded a question on the post-course survey. To account for participants who did not answer questions on the pre- and post-course surveys, we excluded those participants from the pre-/post-survey pairing for those specific questions, while including their responses in the analysis for all other questions.

There was a significant increase (p < 0.05) in self-reported comfort and confidence in providing emergency care and performing critical emergency skills between the pre- and post-course surveys (Table 2). In addition, participants unanimously “strongly agree” that emergency care training for health care providers is important.

Table 2 Pre- and post-course survey results

Discussion

The results from the pre- and post-course examinations suggest that the BEC course is effective in improving senior medical students’ emergency medicine knowledge and skills. The pre-course examination scores (82, range 64–96) were quite high, which implies that students had a solid foundation of emergency medicine knowledge prior to taking the BEC course. However, the statistically significant increase in post-course examination scores (94.5, range 80–100) represents an overall increase in knowledge following the course. The pre- and post-course surveys also show that the BEC course is effective in increasing graduating medical students’ confidence in managing critically ill and injured patients. The increase in the students’ confidence in managing patients with emergencies may indicate the usefulness of the teaching strategies employed by the course including an algorithmic approach to emergency care and opportunities for hands-on skill practice.

The BEC course has been successfully adopted by pre-hospital and hospital-based providers in multiple LMICs, but this is the first time that the BEC course was specifically taught to graduating medical students, to our knowledge. Our findings indicate that the BEC course is a useful means to provide senior medical students in Kenya with basic emergency medicine knowledge and a systematic approach to identifying and addressing life-threatening conditions prior to their intern year. This training may have the added benefit of furthering the development of EM as a specialty, as more medical students become familiar with EM knowledge and potentially elect to pursue EM residency or diploma programs.

Scheduling the BEC course at the end of the medical school term was an optimal time to conduct the training. The participants had completed their medical school studies and clinical rotations, but most students were still living in Nairobi awaiting graduation. This allowed us to reach a large number of students, while not interfering with medical school activities. It would be logistically difficult to conduct a 5-day training during the medical school term, as the students have limited time away from medical school classes and rotations. Efforts to incorporate this training into the medical school curriculum will involve administrators and key stakeholders at the medical school.

While the usefulness and effectiveness of this course were demonstrated in this study, it is important to address the feasibility of replicating this course, especially in LMICs. AFEM regulations impact the number of participants that can be trained at each BEC course. Therefore, this course was capped at 30 participants [25]. Since each medical school class at the University of Nairobi has approximately 250 students, multiple trainings would be necessary to provide the course to all students.

The total cost of the 5-day course was approximately 5000 USD, which included the cost of the venue, refreshments for participants, supplies, and printing costs. This does not include the cost of flights and accommodations for international trainers which separately totaled approximately 4000 USD. When only taking into account the venue, refreshments, supplies, and printing costs, the average cost per participant is approximately 160 USD. However, if you include the cost of flights and accommodations for visiting trainers, the average cost per participant is nearly double at 300 USD.

While many of the supplies can be reused for future courses, the venue, refreshments, and printing costs (approximately 3500 USD) will accrue with each course. Steps to reduce the total cost of the course should be considered to make this course more financially feasible to groups with limited funding. Future facilitators could consider requesting donation of venue space from local universities or religious groups. Facilitators should also make conscious efforts to use locally available materials for skills stations. Participants could also be asked to contribute a small fee to attend the course, although this may cause the course to become cost-prohibitive to some. Alternatively, medical schools could allocate tuition funding towards the course.

The best way to reduce the overall cost of the course, however, involves training more local health care providers. This BEC course was conducted through a collaboration with Kenyan and international physicians. In accordance with WHO and AFEM regulations, course facilitators must have completed both the BEC and Training of Trainers (ToT) course as participants prior to teaching the course [25]. In addition, BEC courses must be conducted under the supervision of a Master Trainer, a facilitator who has both completed the BEC and ToT courses as a participant and has taught BEC courses under another Master Trainer [25]. Given the country or region in which the BEC course is conducted, there may not be local Master Trainers available. This was the first BEC course held in Kenya, and there were no Kenyan Master Trainers at the time of the study. An international Master Trainer was able to join the course, but planning for a Master Trainer, particularly in areas where the BEC is not established, is an important consideration. As more BEC courses are conducted in the same location, particularly in conjunction with the BEC Training of Trainers course, local institutions will be less reliant on visiting international Master Trainers and facilitators.

Limitations

While the BEC course was developed to have universal applicability, this study represents the first implementation of this course in Kenya. It was also conducted at a single site, the University of Nairobi School of Medicine. Further work is needed to expand the BEC course to medical schools throughout Kenya and other LMICs to better determine the generalizability of this specific approach to education in basic emergency care.

This study showed short-term increases in basic emergency medicine knowledge and confidence in managing critically ill patients. Further studies are necessary to evaluate long-term retention of knowledge and skills. In addition, this study did not evaluate the clinical impact of the BEC course. While this would be logistically difficult with our study population, since they are completing their intern year at different sites, this might be more feasible with courses conducted for providers at a single site.

Conclusions

These findings suggest that the BEC course is effective in providing senior medical students with basic emergency medicine knowledge and increasing their confidence to identify and address life-threatening conditions prior to their intern year. Introducing the BEC course at the medical school level may offer a valuable means to increase emergency medicine training in Kenya. Future work should determine if the BEC course is appropriate for medical students in other LMICs.

Availability of data and materials

All datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

AFEM:

African Federation of Emergency Medicine

BEC:

Basic Emergency Care: Approach to the acutely ill and injured Course

EM:

Emergency medicine

HICs:

High-income countries

ICRC:

International Committee of the Red Cross

IFEM:

International Federation for Emergency Medicine

LMICs:

Low- and middle-income countries

ToT:

Training of Trainers

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. Chang CY, Abujaber S, Reynolds TA, Camargo CA, Obermeyer Z. Burden of emergency conditions and emergency care usage: new estimates from 40 countries. Emerg Med J. 2016;33(11):794–800. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2016-205709.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Razzak J, Usmani MF, Bhutta ZA. Global, regional and national burden of emergency medical diseases using specific emergency disease indicators: analysis of the 2015 global burden of disease study. BMJ Global Health. 2019;4(2):e000733. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000733.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. World Health Organization. Emergency care systems for universal health coverage: ensuring timely care for the acutely ill and injured. Geneva: WHO. 2019 May. http://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA72/A72_77-en.pdf. Accessed 4 May 2022.

  4. Kobusingye OC, Hyder AA, Bishai D, Hicks ER, Mock C, Joshipura M. Emergency medical systems in low-and middle-income countries: recommendations for action. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2005;83:626–31. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2626309/. Accessed 30 May 2022.

  5. Levine AC, Presser DZ, Rosborough S, Ghebreyesus TA, Davis MA. Understanding barriers to emergency care in low-income countries: view from the front line. Prehosp Disaster Med. 2007;22(5):467–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1049023X00005240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nowacki AK, Landes M, Azazh A, Ritchie LM. A review of published literature on emergency medicine training programs in low-and middle-income countries. Int J Emerg Med. 2013;6(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1186/1865-1380-6-26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Rybarczyk MM, Ludmer N, Broccoli MC, Kivlehan SM, Niescierenko M, Bisanzo M, et al. Emergency medicine training programs in low- and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Ann Glob Health. 2020;86(1):60. https://doi.org/10.5334/aogh.2681.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Firew T, Gebreyesus A, Woldeyohannes L, Ebrahim F, Patel S. Human resources for emergency care systems in Ethiopia: challenges and triumphs. Afr J Emerg Med. 2020;1(10):S50–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2020.09.006.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hammerstedt H, Maling S, Kasyaba R, Dreifuss B, Chamberlain S, Nelson S, Bisanzo M, Ezati I. Addressing World Health Assembly Resolution 60.22: a pilot project to create access to acute care services in Uganda. Ann Emerg Med. 2014;64(5):461–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.01.035.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Reynolds TA, Mfinanga JA, Sawe HR, Runyon MS, Mwafongo V. Emergency care capacity in Africa: a clinical and educational initiative in Tanzania. J Public Health Policy. 2012;33(1):S126–37. https://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2012.41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Kapoor R, Sandoval MA, Avendaño L, Cruz AT, Soto MA, Camp EA, Crouse HL. Regional scale-up of an Emergency Triage Assessment and Treatment (ETAT) training programme from a referral hospital to primary care health centres in Guatemala. Emerg Med J. 2016;33(9):611–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2015-205057.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Merchant A, Outhay M, Gonzaléz-Calvo L, Moon TD, Sidat M, Taibo CL, McQueen K. Training laypersons and hospital personnel in basic resuscitation techniques: an approach to impact the global trauma burden in Mozambique. World J Surg. 2015;39(6):1433–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-015-2966-z.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Stanley L, Min TH, Than HH, Stolbrink M, McGregor K, Chu C, Nosten FH, McGready R. A tool to improve competence in the management of emergency patients by rural clinic health workers: a pilot assessment on the Thai-Myanmar border. Confl Heal. 2015;9(1):1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13031-015-0041-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wanjiku G, Janeway H, Foggle J, Partridge R, Wang Y, Kearney A, Levine AC, Carter J, Tabu JS. Assessing the impact of an emergency trauma course for senior medical students in Kenya. Afr J Emerg Med. 2017;7(4):167–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2017.04.013.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Aluisio AR, Barry MA, Martin KD, Mbanjumucyo G, Mutabazi ZA, Karim N, Moresky RT, Nyinawankusi JD, Byiringiro JC, Levine AC. Impact of emergency medicine training implementation on mortality outcomes in Kigali, Rwanda: an interrupted time-series study. Afr J Emerg Med. 2019;9(1):14–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2018.10.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Clark M, Spry E, Daoh K, Baion D, Skordis-Worrall J. Reductions in inpatient mortality following interventions to improve emergency hospital care in Freetown, Sierra Leone. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(9):e41458. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0041458.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. World Health Organization. Basic Emergency Care: approach to the acutely ill and injured. World Health Organization; 2018 Dec 17. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/basic-emergency-care-approach-to-the-acutely-ill-and-injured. Accessed 30 May 2022.

  18. Tenner AG, Sawe HR, Amato S, Kalanzi J, Kafwamfwa M, Geduld H, Roddie N, Reynolds TA. Results from a World Health Organization pilot of the basic emergency care course in Sub Saharan Africa. PloS one. 2019;14(11):e0224257. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224257.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. World Health Organization. Piloting the WHO Basic Emergency Care course in Uganda, United Republic of Tanzania and Zambia. World Health Organization. 2015 Dec. https://www.who.int/news-room/photo-story/photo-story-detail/piloting-the-who-basic-emergency-care-course-in-uganda-united-republic-of-tanzania-and-zambia . Accessed 30 May 2022.

  20. MacFarlane C, Green-Thompson L. Medical student education in emergency medicine: new model from South Africa. Emerg Med Australas. 2006;18(3):276–81. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1742-6723.2006.00853.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Mahadevan SV, Walker R, Kalanzi J, Stone LT, Bills C, Acker P, Apfeld JC, Newberry J, Becker J, Mantha A, TecklenburgStrehlow AN. Comparison of online and classroom-based formats for teaching emergency medicine to medical students in Uganda. AEM Education and Training. 2018;2(1):5–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/aet2.10066.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Pean CA, Davis K, Merrill R, Marinelli B, Lockwood A, Mathews Z, Strayer RJ, Poitevien G, Galjour J. Near-peer emergency medicine for medical students in Port-au-Prince, Haiti: an example of rethinking global health interventions in developing countries. Ann Glob Health. 2015;81(2):276–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aogh.2015.03.002.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lee JA, Wanjiku G, Nduku N, Aluisio AR, Kharel R, Simiyu JT, Wachira BW. The status and future of emergency care in the Republic of Kenya. Afr J Emerg Med. 2022;12(1):48–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.afjem.2021.11.003.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Faculty of Health Sciences. Brief history. University of Nairobi; Not-dated. https://healthsciences.uonbi.ac.ke/basic-page/brief-history. Accessed 20 December 2022.

  25. WhatsApp Inc. (Facebook, Inc.). WhatsApp. 2020. Available from: https://whatsapp.com.

  26. African Federation of Emergency Medicine. Terms of Reference: Basic Emergency Care Course Facilitator. AFEM; Not-dated. https://afem.africa/project/bec-accreditation/. Accessed 30 May 2022.

  27. African Federation of Emergency Medicine. BEC Course Accreditation. https://afem.africa/project/bec-accreditation/. Accessed 30 May 2022.

  28. R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria; 2020. Available from: https://www.R-project.org/.

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank the University of Nairobi for providing facilities to support this training. A special thanks to Dr. Swasthi Singh and Dr. Raya Mussa for providing valuable support and guidance to the Nairobi BEC Team. Additional thanks to Daniel J Hekman, Senior Data Analyst and Data Scientist at the University of Wisconsin-Madison Department of Emergency Medicine, for his generous assistance with data analysis.

Funding

This research study was supported by the Framework in Global Health Grant from Brown University, the Office of Global Health Education’s Global Health Scholars Program at the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, and the Department of Emergency Medicine at the University of Wisconsin-Madison. The funding from these sources was used to purchase supplies and equipment for the BEC training and support the researchers’ and course facilitators’ travel expenses. These funding sources did not play a role in the design of the study, the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, or the writing of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

GW and JM conceived the original idea, taught the BEC course, and edited/revised the manuscript. NM obtained IRB approval, obtained grant funding, coordinated and taught the BEC course, collected and analyzed data, and was a major contributor in writing the manuscript. MG and D Ouma assisted with IRB development, carried out the needs assessment, and taught the BEC course. GD assisted with IRB development and coordinated and taught the BEC course. TW assisted with IRB development, obtained funding, coordinated and taught the BEC course, and assisted with data analysis. D Ojuka served as the site coordinator and provided support for the BEC course. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nichole Michaeli.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The authors certify that the study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. This study was reviewed and approved by the Kenyatta National Hospital—University of Nairobi Ethics and Research Committee, protocol P703/12/2020 and the Lifespan IRB, protocol 1736842–2. All participants provided written consent to participate in the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Michaeli, N., De Luca, G., Gitau, M. et al. Evaluation of the World Health Organization—International Committee of the Red Cross Basic Emergency Care course for senior medical students. Int J Emerg Med 16, 29 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-023-00487-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-023-00487-z

Keywords