Skip to main content

Unexpected carboxyhemoglobin half-life during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a case report



Cardiac arrest (CA) following CO poisoning (CO-induced CA) exposes patients to an extremely high risk of mortality and remains challenging to treat effectively. Terminal carboxyhemoglobin elimination half-life (COHbt1/2) is critically affected by ventilation, oxygen therapy, and cardiac output, which are severely affected conditions in cases of CA.

Case presentation

Asystole occurred in an 18-year-old woman after unintentional exposure to CO in her bathroom. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was started immediately, including mechanical ventilation with a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) of 1.0 and external chest compressions with a LUCAS® device. CPR was stopped after 101 min, as it was unsuccessful. During this period, we calculated a COHbt1/2 of 40.3 min using a single compartmental model.


This result suggests that prolongation of CPR time needed to back COHb at 10%, a level more compatible with successful return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC), could be compatible with a realistic CPR time. Calculating COHbt1/2 during CPR may help with decision-making regarding the optimal duration of resuscitation efforts and further with HBO2 or ECLS. Further evidence-based data are needed to confirm this result.


Carbon monoxide (CO) poisoning remains the main cause of unintentional, intentional, and fire-related poisoning deaths around the world [1,2,3]. The overall mortality rate is marginally affected by the level of medical care provided, with a fatality rate of approximately 3% [4]. Commonly identified factors that are strongly correlated to a higher mortality rate include concomitant cyanide intoxication, loss of consciousness (LOC), COHb levels > 25%, arterial pH, and the need for endotracheal intubation. Moreover, the mortality rate of CO-induced CA may be as high as 100% [5]. However, in certain cases, some patients with CO poisoning could benefit from more aggressive or prolonged treatment [6].

Current evidence shows that oxygen (O2) therapy reduces blood carbon monoxide elimination half-life (COHbt1/2), but its influence on neurological outcome is inconsistent [7,8,9,10,11]. Despite a lack of high-level evidence, hyperbaric oxygen (HBO2) therapy is recommended by many scientific societies for severe CO poisoning [12,13,14,15]. There are currently no specific recommendations that deal specifically with cardiac arrest (CA) following CO poisoning (CO-induced CA) [16,17,18]. A review conducted in 2001 concluded that there was an extremely poor survival prognosis for CO-induced CA, with or without HBO2 [5]. To our knowledge, there have been no more recent publications on this topic, and none of the studies mentioned COHbt1/2 during CPR. COHbt1/2 is affected by ventilation, oxygen therapy, and cardiac output, all of which are conditions severely impaired by CA [11, 19]. As such, we investigated COHbt1/2 during prolonged CPR in a case of CA following unintentional CO exposure.

Case presentation

An 18-year-old woman with no previous medical history was unintentionally exposed to carbon monoxide (CO) from a water heater at home and was discovered unconscious on her bathroom floor. According to her family, she had gone into the bathroom 1 h earlier. The mobile emergency and resuscitation service (SMUR) found her pulseless in asystole and CO poisoning was confirmed via a bedside CO detector (alarm without a displayed value) (Fig. 1). Advanced cardiac life support (ACLS) was applied at home by the emergency physician according to European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines [20]. Intubation was immediately performed on site and mechanical ventilation was initiated with a fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2) of 1.0 for the entire duration of resuscitation (Fig. 1). Following evidence of unsuccessful CPR after 30 min with sustained asystole, the decision was made to transport the patient to a tertiary referral hospital while ongoing CPR was performed.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Timeline of our case report on cardiac arrest following CO poisoning and COHbt1/2. LOC, loss of consciousness; CPR, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; LUCAS® external chest compressions device for the last 45 min; SMUR, mobile emergency and resuscitation service

CPR was continued when the patient arrived at the referral hospital. During CPR, repeated arterial blood gas analysis was performed using a point-of-care ABL90Flex® blood gas analyzer (Radiometer™, Radiometer Medical Aps, Denmark). Our secondary focus for the six blood samples analyzed during CPR was arterial COHb. In total, the unsuccessful resuscitation efforts lasted for 101 min. The patient was ventilated with a FiO2 of 1.0 during this period and chest compressions were performed with an external LUCAS® thoracic compression device (Fig. 1) during the last 45 min of CPR. Assuming that the elimination of CO followed a single compartmental model, we calculated a COHbt1/2 of 40.3 min from the six data points [11].

Discussion and conclusions

In this patient with CO-induced CA, we observed a COHbt1/2 of 40.3 min during CPR with external chest compressions and controlled mechanical ventilation with an FiO2 of 1.0. This was much lower than expected and closer to the figure reported with HBO2 therapy with spontaneous breathing [11, 21,22,23,24]. This finding suggests that, in cases of CO-induced CA, the duration of resuscitation may be extended up to the conventional recommendation of 30 min. This is with an empirical objective of reaching a COHb level lower than the 10% typically found in smokers and considered as a non or low COHb level toxicity [20, 25].

For patients with spontaneous breathing with normobaric oxygen therapy and a non-rebreathing mask, COHbt1/2 is 74 ± 25 min [26 to 148] [11]. For normobaric oxygen therapy, Levasseur et al. reported a COHBt1/2 of 92 ± 40 min in fire victims with controlled ventilation with a FiO2 of 1.0 [21]. Conversely, with HBO2 therapy, the COHbt1/2 is estimated to be around 23.3 min or even > 43 min [22, 26]. However, these values were assessed in the absence of severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction and may be underestimated in cases of CA [26]. It seems that no other case report regarding COHbt1/2 in a pure CO-poisoning and CA patient has been published. The reasons for this unexpectedly short CO half-life during CPR merit discussion. First, we can hypothesize that it is, at least partly, due to early intubation and mechanical ventilation with a FiO2 of 1.0 and sustained external chest compressions. Second, COHbt1/2 in clinical practice is typically quoted on normobaric oxygen therapy at 74 min ± 25 [26–148], which reflects a very wide range that includes our low value [11]. In fact, the elimination time of exposure to CO for a short duration may enable lower CO diffusion to extravascular compartments. For a short duration at high-level exposure, COHbt1/2 is shorter than a long duration at low-level exposure [27]. In addition, COHbt1/2 may be slightly shorter for females due to total hemoglobin and muscle myoglobin mass [28, 29]. Furthermore, despite the fact that we applied the ERC guidelines [20], arterial pH was less than 7.0 during CPR. With this acidity level, we suspect a lower affinity of Hb for CO, even if we did not confirm this hypothesis in a recent meta-analysis [30].

High COHb levels are a marker of exposure but unrelated to clinical presentation or outcome [14]. Even in the absence of strong evidence, we suggest that COHb levels should be monitored regularly during CPR with the objective of reaching COHb levels lower than 10% before deciding to stop CPR. Indeed, COHb levels lower than 10% are frequently observed in smokers and are considered to be non-toxic [25]. This target could be reached within a reasonable period compatible with ROSC [31]. However, CO binds to cardiomyoglobin and to cytochrome-c oxidase, which interferes with cellular respiration [32, 33], but is not available in clinical practice to estimate the CO body burden. Thus, the CO burden impact could be prolonged beyond %COHb back to 10% [27, 34].

Unfortunately, the patient did not survive. We stopped CPR without reaching the COHb level at 10% because the “no flow” before CPR was considered too long to hope for a CPR success. This adverse outcome is not surprising [5]. The current survival rate of all-cause out-of-hospital CA is less than 10% [35]. In cases of CO-induced CA, brain injury is worsened by the absence of O2 delivery and by the other biochemical mechanisms of CO toxicity [36]. After O2 supply therapy, mitochondria respiration inhibited by CO is restored more slowly compared to mitochondria simply deprived of oxygen [5]. These mechanisms lead to consider HBO2 therapy for CO-induced CA. Hampson et al. reported that 100% of the directors of HBO2 therapy medical centers would recommend HBO2 therapy for extremely unstable CO poisoning, predicting a 74% chance of survival after HBO2, and a 28% chance of complete recovery without neurologic sequelae [5]. However, in Hampson’s case series, the mortality rate among 18 patients with CO-related CA treated by HBO2 was 100% [5]. Indeed, patients who developed CO-induced CA rarely survived, even if a return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) was achieved [37]. No study considers the COHb% threshold in a protocol to assess the chances of survival. Ideally, HBO2 therapy should be initiated as soon as possible in the first 6 h. Six hours corresponds to the “golden hour” that could decrease the incidence of delayed neurological sequelae from CO poisoning [38]. Unstable patients requiring multiple vasoactive drugs are not easily transferred safely to an HBO2 chamber. Despite this, some authors suggest speeding up the transfer to HBO2 chambers due to the fear of impending cardiac arrest [39]. It should be noted that patients who require chest compressions, intubation, or positive pressure ventilation during their resuscitation are at an increased risk of an HBO2-induced tension pneumothorax [39]. On the other hand, extra-corporeal life support (ECLS) has been applied with success in some selected cases as during cardiovascular failure but not after cardiac arrest [40,41,42]. ECLS was not pursued because in our Center ECLS protocol is only considered in cardiac arrest with a certainty of less than 10 min “no flow”. It appears that ECLS and HBO2 may have complementary effects: ECLS improves oxygenation to target organs independently from heart and lung failure, while HBO2 is more effective in ensuring high O2 dissolution in brain and heart cells [43]. The 2015 guidelines of the European Resuscitation Council concluded that there is an unproven benefit of transporting patients with ROSC to an HBO2 therapy facility and that such a decision must be considered on a case-by-case basis [37]. Transfer to a tertiary referral hospital could be partly motivated by the possible consideration of organ donation [44, 45].

The vast majority (88%) of patients who achieved sustained ROSC after CA from any cause did so within 30 min of CPR, and CPR longer than 20 min after asystole is generally accepted as futile [46]. However, in specific cases of presumably reversible causes (airway obstruction, hypothermia, poisoning, etc.), the optimal CPR duration remains a case-by-case bedside decision that may, for CO-induced CA, take into account the rate of CO elimination [46, 47]. Interestingly, in Hampson’s fatal CO poisoning retrospective review, the duration of CPR ranged from 19 to 45 min [5]. The lack of information about the duration of the “no flow” period could also affect the physician’s attitude to the prolongation of CPR. The difference between patients with signs of life before they go into cardiac arrest and those already found with no pulse is an important factor to consider in assessing hypoxic brain injury. Indeed, we only found two clinical descriptions of patient survival with good neurological recovery for patients that underwent mechanical ventilation and hypothermic therapy, without HBO2 therapy. Both patients presented with CA in the emergency department (ED). ROSC was achieved after a few minutes without a “no flow” period [48,49,50]. The determination of the “no flow” period appears to be particularly difficult in patients with CO poisoning as a loss of consciousness may precede CA and may be erroneously considered an absence of cerebral blood flow. In our opinion, CPR should be initiated in any case of CO-induced CA and extended when circulatory collapse or CA is witnessed by responders. CPR could be prolonged until a COHb rate < 10% is reached, a level expected to allow ROSC occurrence, especially if the CO body burden is suspected to be low in case of short CO exposure time.

In our case report of CO-induced CA with prolonged CPR including controlled mechanical ventilation at a FiO2 of 1.0, we observed a COHbt1/2 much lower than expected. This result suggests that prolonged CPR may lead to a COHb level which could be compatible with successful ROSC. Calculating COHbt1/2 during CPR may help in decision-making regarding the optimal duration of resuscitation efforts and further therapy with HBO2 or ECLS. Further evidence-based data are needed to confirm this result.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable (see Fig. 1).



Advanced cardiac life support


Cardiac arrest

CO-induced CA:

Cardiac arrest following CO poisoning


Carbon monoxide


Cardiopulmonary resuscitation


Extra-corporeal life support


Emergency department


European Resuscitation Council

FiO2 :

Fraction of inspired oxygen

HBO2 :

Hyperbaric oxygen



COHbt1/2 :

Carbon monoxide elimination half-life


Loss of consciousness

O2 :



Return of spontaneous circulation


Mobile emergency and resuscitation service


  1. Roderique JD, et al. A modern literature review of carbon monoxide poisoning theories, therapies, and potential targets for therapy advancement. Toxicology. 2015;334:45–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Iqbal S, et al. National carbon monoxide poisoning surveillance framework and recent estimates. Public Health Rep. 2012;127(5):486–96.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hampson NB. U.S. Mortality Due to Carbon Monoxide Poisoning, 1999–2014. Accidental and Intentional Deaths. Ann Am Thorac Soc. 2016;13(10):1768–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Hampson NB, Hauff NM. Risk factors for short-term mortality from carbon monoxide poisoning treated with hyperbaric oxygen. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(9):2523–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Hampson NB, Zmaeff JL. Outcome of patients experiencing cardiac arrest with carbon monoxide poisoning treated with hyperbaric oxygen. Ann Emerg Med. 2001;38(1):36–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Ostrowski RP, Zhang JH. Risk factors for short-term mortality from carbon monoxide poisoning treated with hyperbaric oxygen. Crit Care Med. 2008;36(9):2684–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Nakajima M, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy and mortality from carbon monoxide poisoning: A nationwide observational study. Am J Emerg Med. 2020;38(2):225–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Simonsen C, et al. Carbon monoxide poisoning in Denmark with focus on mortality and factors contributing to mortality. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(1):e0210767.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang CC, et al. Impact of Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy on Subsequent Neurological Sequelae Following Carbon Monoxide Poisoning. J Clin Med. 2018;7(10):349.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Lin CH, et al. Treatment with normobaric or hyperbaric oxygen and its effect on neuropsychometric dysfunction after carbon monoxide poisoning: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Medicine (Baltimore). 2018;97(39):e12456.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Weaver LK, et al. Carboxyhemoglobin half-life in carbon monoxide-poisoned patients treated with 100% oxygen at atmospheric pressure. Chest. 2000;117(3):801–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Buckley NA, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen for carbon monoxide poisoning. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;2011(4):Cd002041.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Annane D, et al. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for acute domestic carbon monoxide poisoning: two randomized controlled trials. Intensive Care Med. 2011;37(3):486–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hampson NB, et al. Practice recommendations in the diagnosis, management, and prevention of carbon monoxide poisoning. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2012;186(11):1095–101.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Moon RE, Editor. Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society Hyperbaric Oxygen Therapy Indications. 14th Edition. North Palm Beach, FL: Undersea and Hyperbaric Medical Society; 2019.

  16. Hampson NB, et al. Selection criteria utilized for hyperbaric oxygen treatment of carbon monoxide poisoning. J Emerg Med. 1995;13(2):227–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Weaver L. Hyperbaric oxygen therapy for carbon monoxide poisoning. Undersea Hyperb Med. 2014;41:339–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Mathieu D, Marroni A, Kot J. Tenth European Consensus Conference on Hyperbaric Medicine: recommendations for accepted and non-accepted clinical indications and practice of hyperbaric oxygen treatment. Diving Hyperb Med. 2017;47(1):24–32.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Zavorsky GS, et al. Increased carbon monoxide clearance during exercise in humans. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012;44(11):2118–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Perkins GD, et al. Cardiac arrest and cardiopulmonary resuscitation outcome reports: update of the Utstein Resuscitation Registry Templates for Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest: a statement for healthcare professionals from a task force of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (American Heart Association, European Resuscitation Council, Australian and New Zealand Council on Resuscitation, Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada, InterAmerican Heart Foundation, Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa, Resuscitation Council of Asia); and the American Heart Association Emergency Cardiovascular Care Committee and the Council on Cardiopulmonary, Critical Care, Perioperative and Resuscitation. Circulation. 2015;132(13):1286–300.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Levasseur L, et al. Effects of mode of inhalation of carbon monoxide and of normobaric oxygen administration on carbon monoxide elimination from the blood. Hum Exp Toxicol. 1996;15(11):898–903.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Peterson JE, Stewart RD. Absorption and elimination of carbon monoxide by inactive young men. Arch Environ Health. 1970;21(2):165–71.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Pace N, Strajman E, Walker EL. Acceleration of carbon monoxide elimination in man by high pressure oxygen. Science. 1950;111(2894):652–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Myers R, Jones D, Britten J. Carbon monoxide half-life study. In: Proceedings of the Eighth International Congress on Hyperbaric Medicine. Flagstaff: Best Publishing; 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cronenberger C, et al. Population pharmacokinetic analysis of carboxyhaemoglobin concentrations in adult cigarette smokers. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2008;65(1):30–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Weaver LK, Deru K. Carboxyhemoglobin half-life during hyperbaric oxygen in a patient with lung dysfunction: a case report. Undersea Hyperb Med. 2017;44(2):173–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Bruce MC, Bruce EN. Analysis of factors that influence rates of carbon monoxide uptake, distribution, and washout from blood and extravascular tissues using a multicompartment model. J Appl Physiol. 2006;100(4):1171–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Joumard R, et al. Mathematical models of the uptake of carbon monoxide on hemoglobin at low carbon monoxide levels. Environ Health Perspect. 1981;41:277–89.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Pan KT, Leonardi GS, Croxford B. Factors Contributing to CO Uptake and Elimination in the Body: A Critical Review. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(2):528.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Delvau N, et al. Relative Affinity M Constant of Adult and Fetal Hemoglobin for Carbon Monoxide in Humans: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Hum Physiol. 2020;46:191–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Truhlář A, et al. European resuscitation council guidelines for resuscitation 2015: section 4. Resuscitation. 2015;95:148–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Alonso JR, et al. Carbon monoxide specifically inhibits cytochrome c oxidase of human mitochondrial respiratory chain. Pharmacol Toxicol. 2003;93(3):142–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Satran D, et al. Cardiovascular manifestations of moderate to severe carbon monoxide poisoning. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45(9):1513–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Mao Q, et al. Sensitive quantification of carbon monoxide in vivo reveals a protective role of circulating hemoglobin in CO intoxication. Commun Biol. 2021;4(1):425.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Berdowski J, et al. Global incidences of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest and survival rates: Systematic review of 67 prospective studies. Resuscitation. 2010;81(11):1479–87.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Weaver LK. Clinical practice. Carbon monoxide poisoning. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(12):1217–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Truhlar A, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 4. Resuscitation. 2015;95:148–201.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Thom SR, et al. Delayed neuropsychologic sequelae after carbon monoxide poisoning: prevention by treatment with hyperbaric oxygen. Ann Emerg Med. 1995;25(4):474–80.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sloan EP, et al. Complications and protocol considerations in carbon monoxide-poisoned patients who require hyperbaric oxygen therapy: report from a ten-year experience. Ann Emerg Med. 1989;18(6):629–34.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Teerapuncharoen K, et al. Successful Treatment of Severe Carbon Monoxide Poisoning and Refractory Shock Using Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation. Respir Care. 2015;60(9):e155–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. McCunn M, et al. Extracorporeal support in an adult with severe carbon monoxide poisoning and shock following smoke inhalation: a case report. Perfusion. 2000;15(2):169–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Baran DA, et al. Pediatric Veno-Veno Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Rescue From Carbon Monoxide Poisoning. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2020;36(10):e592.

  43. Wang GS, et al. Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) for Severe Toxicological Exposures: Review of the Toxicology Investigators Consortium (ToxIC). J Med Toxicol. 2016;12(1):95–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Wood DM, Dargan PI, Jones AL. Poisoned patients as potential organ donors: postal survey of transplant centres and intensive care units. Crit Care. 2003;7(2):147–54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Fujisaki N, et al. Can carbon monoxide-poisoned victims be organ donors? Med Gas Res. 2014;4:13.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Bossaert LL, et al. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 11. The ethics of resuscitation and end-of-life decisions. Resuscitation. 2015;95:302–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Goldberger ZD, et al. Duration of resuscitation efforts and survival after in-hospital cardiac arrest: an observational study. Lancet. 2012;380(9852):1473–81.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Mumma BE, et al. Neurologic recovery following cardiac arrest due to carbon monoxide poisoning. Resuscitation. 2009;80(7):835.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Abdulaziz S, et al. Status epilepticus and cardiopulmonary arrest in a patient with carbon monoxide poisoning with full recovery after using a neuroprotective strategy: a case report. J Med Case Rep. 2012;6:421.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  50. Kamijo Y, et al. Severe carbon monoxide poisoning complicated by hypothermia: a case report. Am J Emerg Med. 2011;29(3):357.e5-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references




No funding was provided or solicited for the publication of this case report.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations



ND, VF, and AP managed medical care and collected data. PH analyzed the data. ND wrote the manuscript with support from FT, PMR, and PH. All authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript. The author(s) read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nicolas Delvau.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

We confirm that protocol was examined by Ethics Committee Hospitalo-Facultaire Saint-Luc – UCL, and received a positive opinion for the publication of this case report as of December 08, 2022. In accordance with the necessary requirements for the respect of the confidentiality of medical data under the Belgian law on the protection of privacy of July 30, 2018, and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR), written informed consent from a participant was waived for publication of this case report due to the fact that the patient is anonymized. We confirmed that all methods were performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Delvau, N., Penaloza, A., Franssen, V. et al. Unexpected carboxyhemoglobin half-life during cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a case report. Int J Emerg Med 16, 22 (2023).

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI:


  • Carbon monoxide poisoning
  • Cardiac arrest
  • Cardiopulmonary resuscitation
  • Carboxyhemoglobin half-life
  • Case report