Skip to main content
Download PDF

The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric emergency department utilization in three regions in Switzerland

International Journal of Emergency Medicine volume 17, Article number: 64 (2024) Cite this article

Abstract

Purpose

The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with a decrease in emergency department (ED) visits. However, contradictory, and sparse data regarding children could not yet answer the question, how pediatric ED utilization evolved throughout the pandemic. Our objectives were to investigate the impact of the pandemic in three language regions of Switzerland by analyzing trends over time, describe regional differences, and address implications for future healthcare.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective, longitudinal cohort study at three Swiss tertiary pediatric EDs (March 1st, 2018—February 28th, 2022), analyzing the numbers of ED visits (including patients` age, triage categories, and urgent vs. non-urgent cases). The impact of COVID-19 related non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) on pediatric ED utilization was assessed by interrupted time series (ITS) modelling.

Results

Based on 304′438 ED visits, we found a drop of nearly 50% at the onset of NPIs, followed by a gradual recovery. This primarily affected children 0–4 years, and both non-urgent and urgent cases. However, the decline in urgent visits appeared to be more pronounced in two centers compared to a third, where also hospitalization rates did not decrease significantly during the pandemic. A subgroup analysis showed a significant decrease in respiratory and gastrointestinal diseases, and an increase in the proportion of trauma patients during the pandemic.

Conclusions

The COVID-19 pandemic had substantial effects on number and reasons for pediatric ED visits, particularly among children 0–4 years. Despite equal regulatory conditions, the utilization dynamics varied markedly between the three regions, highlighting the multifactorial modification of pediatric ED utilization during the pandemic. Furthermore, future policy decisions should take regional differences into account.

What is known

While a substantial decrease in utilization of emergency department (ED) visits by adults has been described during the COVID-19 pandemic, There were contradictory reports regarding children.

What is new

Based on more than 300′000 pediatric ED visits in three regions of Switzerland, we found a drop of nearly 50%, particularly in 0–4-year-old children, for both non-urgent and urgent medical conditions. Despite equal regulatory conditions, the utilization dynamics varied markedly between regions. Future policy decisions should take regional differences into account.

Introduction

The first cases of Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in Europe were recorded at the end of January 2020, with a subsequent rapid spread all over the continent and a significant rise in morbidity and mortality [1]. COVID-19 was declared a pandemic on March 11th 2020 by the World Health Organization (WHO), with 114 countries reporting more than 118,000 cases and 4,291 deaths due to the disease [2]. To combat the pandemic, public health measures, including social distancing, and hygiene measures were implemented in many countries. The strongest response to the pandemic were temporary nationwide non-pharmaceutical interventions (NPIs) imposed by the government with stay-at-home orders, school closures, and the shutdown of public life – in the public referred to as “lockdown”.

International evidence indicates that the COVID-19 pandemic caused significant changes in the utilization of health services [3,4,5]. Until 2020, the numbers of patient visits in pediatric emergency departments (EDs) had steadily increased over the last decades, culminating in severe overcrowding [6,7,8,9]. During the nationwide NPIs, pediatric ED visits remarkably dropped in numerous countries, with decreases ranging from 57% in Canada to 88% in Italy. This was mostly attributed to the stay-at-home policies and fear of catching or transmitting COVID-19 [10,11,12,13]. However, the reduction was greater in low-acuity triage scores, such as respiratory infections, injuries, and asthma exacerbations compared to high-acuity triage scores [5, 14]. An increase in high priority levels and the rate of hospitalizations at EDs indicated, that patients in urgent need of medical care still came to the ED despite the NPIs. Furthermore, some reports suggested, that delaying pediatric consultations to some extent lead to worsening of the patients` status before consulting the ED [11,12,13,14,15]. However, available publications on ED utilization are not all consistent, and vary in the observed effect sizes. For instance, in France it was shown that the number of visits for non-communicable infectious diseases was not different during a lockdown [16]. In most available publications, pre-pandemic data is compared with data from the time of nationwide NPIs [3,4,5, 11,12,13,14,15,16,17], reporting cross-sectional, single-center data over a short period of time. So far, only few studies used longitudinal analytical approaches to account for trends that already emerged in the pre-pandemic period, or trends across the pandemic phase [18,19,20]. However, most existing longitudinal research did not yet analyze data beyond the initial pandemic year (i.e., did not include data on utilization after lifting containment measures). Particularly studies from Switzerland are missing that compared objective and representative data on pre-pandemic and pandemic utilization of pediatric EDs.

Switzerland is nestled between Italy to the south and France to the west, both nations that were severely hit at the beginning of the pandemic [21, 22]. Accordingly, regional differences in mortalities within Switzerland were noted, with regions closest to Italy and France recording three times more COVID-19 deaths than the German speaking part of Switzerland by the end of the nationwide NPIs [23,24,25,26]. To prevent an uncontrolled,exponential spread of the epidemic and subsequent overburdening the healthcare system, the Swiss government introduced several public health measures to reduce transmission of COVID-19. On March 13, 2020, all schools were closed and elective and nonemergent medical care was restricted for all health care professions and levels of care, including pediatric care. A few days later (March 16), the most severe NPIs were enacted nationwide, corresponding a COVID-19 stringency index of 73 of 100 according to the Oxford Covid-19 Government Response Tracker [27]. Schools were reopened on May 11, the restriction on elective and nonemergent medical care lasted until May 27, 2020 (corresponding to a COVID-19 stringency index of 58, further dropping to 35 in June). Last restrictions were lifted completely in April 2022. These political decisions applied to all parts of the country.

The aim of this study was to longitudinally investigate the utilization of pediatric ED institutions during and over the COVID-19 pandemic and the installed containment measures in different regions of Switzerland, and address implications for future healthcare.

Material and methods

This retrospective, longitudinal observational study was conducted at three tertiary pediatric EDs in Switzerland, representing the main language regions, from March 1, 2018 to February 28, 2022. Participating EDs were: one in the northern, German speaking part (Zurich, University Children’s Hospital), one in the western, French speaking part (Geneva, University Hospital), and one in the southern, Italian speaking part of Switzerland (Ticino, Pediatric Institute of Italian part of Switzerland).

Each patient visiting a pediatric ED, age 0 – 18 years old, at the participating centers was registered and an electronic medical file was created. The study utilized fully anonymized patient data from these files, including age, sex, day of ED registration, triage category, and type of treatment, as well as diagnoses in a subset of patients. The dataset obtained the following variables:

Patient age: the patient’s age was available in years, and then grouped into three categories: 0–4 years old, 5–12 years old, and 13–18 years old.

Triage categories: Triage categories are utilized to prioritize patient care according to their clinical urgency [28, 29]. The Australasian Triage Scale (ATS) was used in Zurich and Ticino, with five categories defined as follows: 1 = Immediately life-threatening, 2 = Imminently life-threatening (doctor contact within 10 min), 3 = Potentially life-threatening (doctor contact within 30 min), 4 = Potentially serious (doctor contact within 60 min), 5 = Less urgent (doctor contact within 120 min) [28]. The Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale (CTAS) was used in Geneva, consisting of the same five categories as the ATS, but with a difference in the time until doctor contact for triage scale 2, which was 15 min [29]. Both scales rate acuteness and severity in a very similar way [30]. For analysis purposes, triage scores 1–3, irrespective of triage scale, were considered as an urgent medical condition, while scores 4–5 were considered non-urgent.

Type of treatment: the type of treatment was categorized as outpatient or inpatient (i.e., hospital admission).

Diagnoses: Non-coded Diagnoses in 2019 and 2020 (only available in the German speaking part of Switzerland) were manually categorized into main categories: respiratory disease (e.g., infections, asthma), gastrointestinal disease (e.g., gastroenteritis, constipation), trauma (e.g., fracture, laceration, burn), skin disorders (e.g., rash, atopic dermatitis), infectious diseases others (e.g., soft tissue infections, osteoarticular infections, sepsis), nephrological/genital (e.g., infections, torsion of a testicle, glomerulonephritis), neurological (e.g., headache, syncope, seizure), mental health issues, foreign bodies, musculoskeletal/rheumatologic (non-traumatic disorders), cardiovascular (e.g., palpitation, heart failure), healthy, and others (e.g., hematological, allergic, postsurgical complications). Grouped diagnoses from March and April 2019 were compared to respective months in 2020.

Statistical analyses

Interrupted time series (ITS) modelling was used to assess the COVID-19 related impact and compare pre-pandemic and pandemic health service consultations. The weekly number of ED visits in each cantonal hospital was calculated using the ISO 8601 standard to define weeks in the year. The first and last weeks of data (ISO week 9 in 2018 and 2022) were excluded as they had only partial counts, and week 53 of 2020 was also removed to ensure 52 weeks per year. The changepoint was set to week 12 of 2020 in all cantons, corresponding to the onset of the first nationwide NPIs on March 16th 2020. The pre-pandemic period was defined as the period preceding the changepoint, while the pandemic period was defined as the period following the changepoint. A transition period of ± 3 weeks around the changepoint (from week 9 to week 15 of 2020) was assumed, and data from this period were not used to fit the model.

This transition period was adopted to account for possible differences regarding the exact timepoint the changes in the number of ED visits would occur in the three cantons.

The ITS model was constructed using two negative binomial regressions (i.e., Poisson regression allowing for overdispersion), each fitted separately to each period. The expected counts were modelled on the logarithmic scale. Each regression included an intercept term and a linear trend (on log scale) for the time (in weeks) since the start of the observation period (i.e., week 10 of 2018), with time = 0 referring to the changepoint in week 12 of 2020. Within each period, seasonality was modelled using Fourier series with two harmonics. Additionally, residual autocorrelation was modelled using an autoregressive moving average (ARMA) process while assuming independence between data from the two periods. A suitable ARMA structure was selected by minimizing the corrected Akaike Information Criterion [31].

Interrupted time series (ITS) modelling was used to assess the COVID-19 related impact and compare pre-pandemic and pandemic health service consultations. The effects of interest (adjusted for seasonality) in the ITS model are as follows:

Time

Quantifies the pre-pandemic trend. The corresponding coefficient estimates the ratio of the expected number of visits (adjusted for seasonality) for two weeks separated by one year during the pre-pandemic period. A value of 1 indicates a stable condition (no change over time). A value above 1 suggests that the expected number of visits increased during the pre-pandemic period, while a value below 1 suggests that this number decreased.

Pandemic

Quantifies the magnitude of the drop in the number of visits at the onset of nationwide NPIs. The corresponding coefficient estimates the ratio in the expected number of visits (adjusted for seasonality) on week 12 of 2020 according to the pandemic and pre-pandemic models. A value of 1 indicates a stable condition (no change). A value above 1 suggests that the expected number of visits increased at the onset of nationwide NPIs, while a value below 1 suggests that this number decreased. Note that the percentage drop in the number of visits is quantified by one minus the pandemic coefficient.

Time x pandemic

Quantifies the difference between the pandemic and pre-pandemic trends (i.e., the interaction term in a regular ITS model). The corresponding coefficient estimates the ratio between the pandemic and pre-pandemic trends. A value of 1 indicates a stable condition (no change in trend between the pre-pandemic and pandemic periods). A value above 1 suggests that the pandemic trend increased compared to the pre-pandemic trend, while a value below 1 suggests that the pandemic trend decreased compared to the pre-pandemic trend.

Statistical analyses were conducted using R version 4.2.2 [32], and the gcmr package [33] was used to fit negative binomial regressions with autocorrelated errors. Categorical data were summarized by frequencies and percentages.

Results

Over the study period from March 2018 to February 2022, a total of 304,438 ED visits were recorded (Zurich: 160,318, Geneva: 110,735, Ticino: and 33,385). The median age of patients visiting the EDs was 4 years (inter-quartile range: 1–9 years), with 54.7% of the children up to four years old, 35.1% aged 5–12 years, and 10.2% aged 13–18 years. Table 1 provides demographic information for the three EDs.

Table 1 Demographics
Full size table

Pre-pandemic trends

Regarding weekly ED visits and trends, ITS modeling revealed that after accounting for seasonality, the expected weekly number of visits in EDs during the pre-pandemic period remained relatively stable in Zurich, while numbers increased by approximately 6% every year in Geneva and Ticino. Taken together, these increases were not statistically significant. However, when focusing on urgent visits, significant pre-pandemic trends were observed in Geneva (+ 10.1% per year, 95% CI [1.2; 19.8]) and Ticino (+ 38.7% per year, 95% CI [22.3; 57.3]), compared to a comparably stable situation in Zurich (+ 4.8% per year, 95% CI [-3.5; 13.9]). In Geneva and Ticino, positive pre-pandemic trends were also observed in the number of hospitalizations (+ 5.1% per year in Geneva, 95% CI [0.5; 9.9], and + 21.6% per year in Ticino, 95% CI [8.5; 36.3]), compared to Zurich (-0.1% per year, 95% CI [-4.8; 4.8]).

Effects of the pandemic

The ITS models revealed a decrease of nearly 50% in the number of ED visits at the onset of nationwide NPIs (-43.9% in Zurich, 95% CI [-38.1; -49.1], -49.4% in Geneva, 95% CI [-36.7; -59.6], -44.2% in Ticino, 95% CI [-35.5; -51.7]). This drop began even slightly before the nationwide NPIs officially started (March 13th 2020), and was followed by a gradual recovery until the second half of 2021 when the number of ED visits reached pre-pandemic levels (Fig. 1 and Table 2). These trends were consistent across all three regions and mainly affected the youngest age group, with a drop exceeding 50% (Fig. 2 and Table 3). In the age groups of 5–12 years old, a smaller drop was observed (-35.5% in Zurich, 95% CI [-30.7; -40.0],—43.0% in Geneva, 95% CI [-28.7; -54.4], -38.0% in Ticino, 95% CI [-29.5; -45.6]). In the age group of 13–18 years old, the reduction was even smaller, but still significant (-22.9% in Zurich, 95% CI [-7.6; -35.6], -34.3% in Geneva, 95% CI [-12.4; -50.7], -26.9% in Ticino, 95% CI [-11.5; -39.7]). However, the time courses of these decreases were not entirely synchronous: for instance, the observed number of visits in the ED in Ticino already dropped drastically in the two weeks preceding the onset of nationwide NPIs.

Fig. 1
figure 1

ITS models of total ED visits in the different language regions of Switzerland. Legend: Red: ITS model of pre-pandemic ED visits (March 1st to February 24th 2018), green: ITS model of pandemic ED visits (April 6th to February 28th 2022), blue: counterfactual extrapolation of the further course of ED visits based on the ITS model of pre-pandemic data, solid line: onset of the first phase of nationwide NPIs on March 16th 2020, dashed line: transition period of ± 3 weeks around March 16.th. ZH: Zurich (German speaking part), GE: Geneva (French speaking part), TI: Ticino (Italian speaking part)

Full size image
Table 2 Model estimates for the weekly total number of visits in emergency departments in Zurich (ZH), Geneva (GE) and Ticino (TI)
Full size table
Fig. 2
figure 2

ITS models of ED visits of children 0–4 years old per language region. Legend: Red: ITS model of pre-pandemic ED visits (March 1st to February 24th 2018), green: ITS model of pandemic ED visits (April 6th to February 28th 2022), blue: counterfactual extrapolation of the further course of ED visits based on the ITS model of pre-pandemic data, solid line: onset of the first phase of nationwide NPIs on March 16th 2020, dashed line: transition period of ± 3 weeks around March 16.th. ZH: Zurich (German speaking part), GE: Geneva (French speaking part), TI: Ticino (Italian speaking part)

Full size image
Table 3 Model estimates for emergency department number of visits (subgroups) in Zurich (ZH), Geneva (GE), and Ticino (TI)
Full size table

Both urgent and non-urgent cases decreased at the onset of nationwide NPIs. Non-urgent cases significantly dropped by 45.0% in Zurich (95% CI [37.3; 51.8],]), 47.4% in Geneva (95% CI [36.4; 56.5]) and 49.8% in Ticino (95% CI [42.2; 56.4]). However, the drop in urgent cases was not as pronounced in Ticino (33.4%) compared to Zurich (42.7%) and Geneva (51.3%) as illustrated in Fig. 3 and Table 3. The number of patients with outpatient care significantly dropped in all regions (-46.4% in Zurich, 95% CI [-38.7; -53.0], -50.1% in Geneva, 95% CI [-37.5; -60.2], -47.6% in Ticino, 95% CI [-39.2; -54.8], data not shown), whereas hospitalizations only decreased at the onset of NPIs in Zurich and Geneva (-25.1% in Zurich, 95% CI [-19.2; -30.7], -40.7% in Geneva, 95% CI [-26.8; -51.9], -1.1% in Ticino, 95% CI [-19.0; 17.8], see Fig. 4).

Fig. 3
figure 3

ITS models of ED visits of urgent cases (triage scores 1–3) per language region. Legend: Red: ITS model of pre-pandemic ED visits (March 1st to February 24th 2018), green: ITS model of pandemic ED visits (April 6th to February 28th 2022), blue: counterfactual extrapolation of the further course of ED visits based on the ITS model of pre-pandemic data, solid line: onset of the first phase of nationwide NPIs on March 16th 2020, dashed line: transition period of ± 3 weeks around March 16.th. ZH: Zurich (German speaking part), GE: Geneva (French speaking part), TI: Ticino (Italian speaking part)

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

ITS models of ED leading to hospitalization per language region. Legend: Red: ITS model of pre-pandemic ED visits (March 1st to February 24th 2018), green: ITS model of pandemic ED visits (April 6th to February 28th 2022), blue: counterfactual extrapolation of the further course of ED visits based on the ITS model of pre-pandemic data, solid line: onset of the first phase of nationwide NPIs on March 16th 2020, dashed line: transition period of ± 3 weeks around March 16th. ZH: Zurich (German speaking part), GE: Geneva (French speaking part), TI: Ticino (Italian speaking part)

Full size image

A gradual catch-up in the number of visits was observed during the pandemic period following nationwide NPIs for most patient groups, but some notable exceptions were identified by the ITS models. First, in contrast to what happened in Geneva and Zurich, the increase in the number of urgent visits in Ticino was not different from that observed during the pre-pandemic period (Fig. 3). Secondly, hospitalizations in Ticino even gradually decreased after the NPIs were released (Fig. 4 and Table 3).

Diagnoses

Grouped diagnoses were evaluated to determine changes in the prevalence of specific medial conditions during the months of March and April from 2019–2020 in the largest subgroup (German speaking part of Switzerland). A detailed analysis of diagnostic groups revealed a significant decrease in respiratory and gastrointestinal diseases in 2020 compared to 2019. As a proportion of visits, communicable diseases such as upper and lower airway infections and gastroenteritis were found to have dropped from 33.4% to 26.5% and from 17.7% to 12.0%, respectively between 2019 and 2020. In contrast, the proportion of visits for trauma during the same period significantly increased from 27.2% in 2019 to 36.3% in 2020 (p < 0.001), despite a drop of the total number of trauma related visits (Table 4). No changes were observed in the proportion of cardiovascular diseases and mental health problems.

Table 4 Number of pediatric ED visits (%) in March and April of 2019 and 2020 by diagnostic group
Full size table

Discussion

The aim of this study was to investigate the utilization of pediatric ED institutions during the COVID-19 pandemic and the installed containment measures in different regions of Switzerland. At the onset of nationwide NPIs, a drop of nearly 50% in the number of ED visits was observed, followed by a gradual catch-up until the second half of 2021 when the number of ED visits reached pre-pandemic levels. This pattern mostly affected the youngest age group (0–4 years old) and was similar for patients with non-urgent and urgent medical conditions in all three regions. However, the decrease in urgent visits appeared more pronounced in Zurich and Geneva than in Ticino. Accordingly, hospitalization rates in the Italian speaking part of Switzerland did not decrease significantly during the pandemic, in contrast to the findings in the German and French speaking parts. In-depth analyses of diagnostic groups revealed a significant decrease in the proportion of viral infections (respiratory and gastrointestinal) in 2020 compared with 2019, whereas the proportion of trauma patients increased significantly.

Dynamics of pediatric ED utilization

The COVID-19 related nationwide NPIs resulted in a nearly 50% decrease in ED visits in Swiss pediatric EDs, which is consistent with findings from international research reporting reductions ranging from 30 to 89% [11,12,13,14,15, 34, 35]. We observed that, pediatric ED visits began to drop even before the nationwide NPIs started (March 13th 2020), as the first positive COVID-19 cases in Switzerland were reported. The time needed until pediatric ED visits reached pre-pandemic levels lasted over a year (spring 2020 to summer 2021) in our study. These results are consistent with an analysis from Portugal, which reported a catch-up of ED visits after stopping NPIs, but did not reach pre-pandemic levels by July 2021 [36]. A US study even found that visits had not yet normalized until January 2022 [23]. The reasons for this may include parents’ fear of contracting COVID-19 in EDs [36,37,38], fewer infections due to containment measures such as wearing face masks at public gatherings [38], and longer lasting and more drastic COVID-19 measures due to a more severe course of the pandemic in the two neighboring countries.

The reduction in pediatric ED visits mostly affected the youngest age group, which usually accounts for the largest proportion of patients in pediatric EDs [39]. Similar results were found by Mataloni et al. [35], who reported a decrease of 50% in children up to the age of five years. The most common diagnoses in pediatric EDs are breathing difficulties, febrile illnesses, and gastroenterits [39], which mostly affect young children [40]. These diseases declined during and after the nationwide installation of NPIs [38, 41]. The lower rates of communicable diseases in this age group were probably caused by fewer contacts with other children and less parent- or siblings-to-child-transmission because of hygiene and containment measures. Whether the observed decrease in ED visits among this age group represents a genuine decline in disease is uncertain, as it is possible that care has shifted to alternative settings. Parents might have opted to avoid visiting EDs with their children too young to wear face masks, and instead chose to visit a pediatrician in private practice, use telemedicine, or just waited for the natural course of the disease without seeking professional aid at pediatric EDs.

Regional variations of effects on different triage and age groups

Urgent and non-urgent cases decreased at the onset of nationwide NPIs in all regions. While the reduction rates for both urgent and non-urgent cases were comparable in Zurich in the French speaking part of Switzerland, the Italian speaking part experienced the most significant drop of non-urgent cases (-49.8%), whereas the decline in urgent cases was less pronounced (-32.4%). These findings are consistent with Italian studies, which have reported notable reductions in non-urgent cases but an increased rate of urgent cases and hospitalizations [4, 11, 12, 14]. Consequently, the rate of hospitalizations did not decrease at the beginning of the pandemic in the Italian speaking region, unlike the German and French speaking part of the country. This disparity may be attributed to the significantly higher incidence of COVID-19 positive cases in the Italian speaking part of Switzerland and bordering north of Italy compared to the other parts of the country during the initial phase of the pandemic. When comparing inpatient and outpatient care, the decrease was very similar for both modalities in Geneva (inpatients: -40.7%, outpatients: -50.1%), but it was most divergent in Ticino (inpatients -1.1%, outpatients -47.6%). Contrary to Zurich and Geneva, Ticino already experienced a pre-pandemic increase in the number of urgent visits which remained unchanged during the pandemic.

Despite official recommendations on pediatric health care, pediatric ED visits halved after the nationwide installation of NPIs in all three language regions, primarily impacting infants and toddlers. Interestingly, we observed clear differences between the three language regions, while equal regulations were in place. In contrast to the number of hospitalizations in the German and French speaking parts of Switzerland, those in the Italian speaking part of the country remained at the pre-pandemic level. Furthermore, the drop of ED visits happened earlier in the Italian speaking part than in the other regions. These regional differences illustrate that, despite equal regulations and rules, utilization behavior can vary considerably—presumably modified by various factors (e.g., differences in the regional severity of the pandemic, local incidences of diseases, as well as attitude, or habits of the respective populations). Therefore, approaches that recognize regional differences rather than global measures may be needed in order to appropriately react to large scale challenges.

Shift of diagnoses over time

Among critically ill patients, seizures, bronchiolitis, and asthma account for the most common diagnoses in pediatric EDs [40]. Since detailed analyses of diagnoses were not possible for the Italian and French speaking part of Switzerland due to unavailable data, changes in the diagnoses of ED patients in Zurich were analyzed. We found that the proportions of respiratory and gastrointestinal diseases decreased, whereas trauma cases proportionally increased during the NPIs. International studies have also reported a significant decline in respiratory and gastrointestinal infections, primarily attributed to reduced opportunities for transmission due to school closures and social distancing measures [3,4,5, 11, 14, 17, 38]. Additionally, the reduction in air pollution resulting from decreased traffic contributed to a reduction of asthma exacerbations [42, 43]. Finally, besides a true decrease in incidence, the lower number of children presenting with viral infections might also in part be explained by their parents` hesitancy to visit an ED due to parental concern about COVID infection leading to later presentation of their sick children to a pediatrician, as described by Davis et al. [10]. Recent publications on trauma cases present inconsistent findings, with some reporting a decline and others reporting an increase in the rate of cases [38, 43]. We found only a minor reduction in absolute numbers of trauma patients, but a 10% increase in the proportion of trauma patients among all ED visits after the end of nationwide NPIs. This stable absolute number is what we would expect given that in Switzerland children were allowed to go outside and outdoor playgrounds were not closed, which might have increased the number of accidents. Furthermore, home accidents may have increased due to less supervision of young children as parents were occupied with working from home, while schools and child care were closed [43], even though the implementation of a stay-at-home policy resulted in fewer accidents due to cancelled sporting events [38]. However, the proportional increase mainly stems from the fact, that other diagnoses were less frequent.

Strengths and limitations

This study has several limitations. Although we analyzed the largest pediatric EDs in each language region, the generalizability of the results to other pediatric hospitals in the respective language region as a whole may be limited as disparities of the populations served might exist. We found no increase of mental health problems, which might be due to the limited period of time we analyzed. In fact, the proportion of mental health issues might have increased later without being captured. Furthermore, our dataset does not cover the post-NPI period (NPIs were completely lifted in April 2022 in Switzerland), as we aimed to primarily focus on the changes during the initial phase of the pandemic and the nationwide start of NPIs in our report. Additionally, diagnoses were only available for Zurich and not Geneva and Ticino. Possible differences between diagnoses in these regions therefore would remain undetected. Also, the number of visits in Ticino are fairly low compared to those in Zurich and Geneva. This must be taken into account in order not to overinterpret observed differences. Nonetheless, the study’s strength lies in its large dataset and longitudinal observations spanning four years, which enabled us to assess the impact of the pandemic. Combining our data with health insurance data on pediatric outpatient health care use during the same time period (such analyses are planned by the PedCov consortium) will help to get further insights into utilization patterns during the pandemic.

The COVID-19 pandemic had enormous implications on healthcare, providing important lessons for future healthcare crises. Our study shows significant changes on pediatric ED utilization, but also regional differences, that call for tailored and dynamic management during future comparable challenges for the health care system. Real-time monitoring not only of positive SARS COV-2 cases, but also of other indicators (e.g., number of well-child visits or vaccinations) might have helped to identify trends in parents` health-related attitudes and behavior even at a regional level, and adapt policies or communicate with the public, accordingly. The three pediatric EDs in our study experienced an unprecedented reduction in visits, which can be partly attributed to the implementation of hygiene measures, and a stay-at-home policy. However, the variations between the participating centers and the fact that reaching pre-pandemic levels took more than a year after lifting restrictions in May 2020 highlight that also other factors like parents` attitudes or habits might play a role in modifying health care utilization. Therefore, health care policies should acknowledge regional differences when deciding on measures in reaction to similar future events. This is particularly true since the installed containment measures also posed risks to children, as delayed ED presentations could lead to serious consequences. New ways to counsel parents, or more successful communication strategies between the authorities and the public might help to better react to future challenges of the pediatric health care sector.

Availability of data and materials

The study results we report here have already been presented on, or submitted as an abstract to scientific conferences (annual meeting of the Swiss and German pediatric societies 2023), but have not been otherwise published yet. Individual participant data cannot be shared, but a data dictionary can be provided upon request to the corresponding author. The study protocol, and statistical analyses performed are described in the methods section of the manuscript.

Abbreviations

ARMA:

Autoregressive moving average

ATS:

Australasian Triage Scale

CTAS:

Canadian Triage and Acuity Scale

CI:

Confidence Interval

ED:

Emergency departments

NPIs:

Non-pharmaceutical Interventions

WHO:

World Health Organization

References

  1. Spiteri G, Fielding J, Diercke M, Campese C, Enouf V, Gaymard A, et al. First cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the WHO European Region, 24 January to 21 February 2020. Euro Surveill. 2020;25(9):2000178. https://doi.org/10.2807/1560-7917.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on COVID-19 - 11 March 2020. https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020.

  3. Chaiyachati BH, Agawu A, Zorc JJ, Balamuth F. Trends in pediatric emergency department utilization after Institution of COVID-19 mandatory social distancing. J Pediatr. 2020;226:274–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.07.048.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ciacchini B, Tonioli F, Marciano C, Faticato MG, Borali E, Prato AP, Felici E. Reluctance to seek pediatric care during the COVID-19 pandemic and the risks of delayed diagnosis. Ital J Pediatr. 2020;46(1):1–4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-020-00849-w.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kenyon CC, Hill DA, Henrickson SE, Bryant-Stephens TC, Zorc JJ. Initial effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric asthma emergency department utilization. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2020;8(8):2774–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaip.2020.05.045.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ter Avest E, Onnes B, van der Vaart T, Land M. Hurry up, it’s quiet in the emergency department. Neth J Med. 2018;76:32–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barata I, Brown KM, Fitzmaurice L, Griffin ES, Snow SK, Medicine AAoPCoPE, et al. Best practices for improving flow and care of pediatric patients in the emergency department. Pediatrics. 2015;135(1):e273–83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Austin EE, Blakely B, Tufanaru C, Selwood A, Braithwaite J, Clay-Williams R. Strategies to measure and improve emergency department performance: a scoping review. Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2020;28(1):55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13049-020-00749-2.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Seiler M, Furrer PR, Staubli G, Albisetti M. Unplanned return visits to a pediatric emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021;37(11):e746–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000001764.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Davis AL, Sunderji A, Marneni SR, Seiler M, Hall JE, Cotanda CP, Klein EJ, Brown JC, Gelernter R, Griffiths MA, Hoeffe J, Gualco G, Mater A, Manzano S, Thompson GC, Ahmed S, Ali S, Goldman RD, International COVID-19 Parental Attitude Study (COVIPAS) Group. Caregiver-reported delay in presentation to pediatric emergency departments for fear of contracting COVID-19: a multi-national cross-sectional study. CJEM. 2021;23(6):778–86. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43678-021-00174-z.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Raucci U, Musolino AM, Di Lallo D, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the emergency department of a tertiary children’s hospital. Ital J Pediatr. 2021;47:21. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13052-021-00976-y.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Liguoroy I, Pilotto C, Vergine M, Pusiol A, Vidal E, Cogo P. The impact of COVID-19 on a tertiary care pediatric emergency department. Eur J Pediatr. 7 July 2023http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00431-020-03909-9

  13. Lazzerini M, Barbi E, Apicella A, Marchetti F, Cardinale F, Trobia G. Delayed access or provision of care in Italy resulting from fear of COVID-19. Lancet Child Adolesc Health. 2020;4(5):e10–1. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352-4642(20)30108-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Cozzi G, Zanchi C, Giangreco M, Rabach I, Calligaris L, Giorgi R, et al. The impact of the COVID-19 lockdown in Italy on a paediatric emergency setting. Acta Paediatr. 2020;109(10):2157–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Molina Gutiérrez MÁ, Ruiz Domínguez JA, Bueno Barriocanal M, de Miguel LB, López López R, Martín Sánchez J, et al. Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on emergency department: Early findings from a hospital in Madrid. Anales de Pediatría (English Edition). 2020;93(5):313–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Angoulvant F, Ouldali N, Yang DD, Filser M, Gajdos V, Rybak A, et al. Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: impact caused by school closure and national lockdown on pediatric visits and admissions for viral and nonviral infections-a time series analysis. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72(2):319–22.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Dopfer C, Wetzke M, Scharff AZ, Mueller F, Dressler F, Baumann U, Sasse M, Hansen G, Jablonka A, Happle C. COVID-19 related reduction in pediatric emergency healthcare utilization – a concerning trend. BMC Pediatrics. 2020;20:427. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-020-02303-6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Irvine MA, Portales-Casamar E, Goldman RD. An interrupted time-series analysis of pediatric emergency department visits during the Coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021;37(6):325–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Alongi A, D’Aiuto F, Montomoli C, Borrelli P. Impact of the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric emergency department attendance in a tertiary center in South Italy: an interrupted time-series analysis. Healthcare (Basel). 2023;11(11):1638.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lopes S, Soares P, Santos Sousa J, Rocha JV, Boto P, Santana R. Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the frequency of emergency department visits in Portugal: An interrupted time series analysis until July 2021. J Am Coll Emerg Phys Open. 2023;4(1): e12864.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zanin GM, Gentile E, Parisi A, Spasiano D. A preliminary evaluation of the public risk perception related to the Covid-19 health emergency in Italy. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020;17(9):3024. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17093024.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Darques R, Trottier J, Gaudin R, et al. Clustering and mapping the first COVID-19 outbreak in France. BMC Public Health. 2022;22:1279. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-022-13537-7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Federal Office of Public Health FOPH. Covid-19 in Switzerland. https://covid-19-schweiz.bagapps.ch/de-2.html. Accessed 31 August 2020

  24. Federal Office of Public Health FOPH. Epidemiologische Zwischenbilanz zum neuen Coronavirus in der Schweiz und im Fürstentum Liechtenstein. https://www.bag.admin.ch/bag/de/home/krankheiten/ausbrueche-epidemien-pandemien/aktuelle-ausbrueche-epidemien/novel-cov/situation-schweiz-und-international.html#2030838475.

  25. Scire J, Nadeau S, Vaughan TG, Brupbacher G, Fuchs S, Sommer J, et al. Reproductive number of the COVID-19 epidemic in Switzerland with a focus on the Cantons of Basel-Stadt and Basel-Landschaft. Swiss Med Wkly. 2020;150:w20271. https://doi.org/10.4414/smw.2020.20271.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Seiler M, Staubli G, Hoeffe J, Gualco G, Manzano S, Goldman RD. A tale of two parts of Switzerland: regional differences in the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on parents. BMC Public Health. 2021;21(1):1275. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-11315-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  27. Hale T, Angrist N, Goldszmidt R, Kira B, Petherick A, Phillips T, et al. A global panel database of pandemic policies (Oxford COVID-19 Government Response Tracker). Nat Hum Behav. 2021;5(4):529–38.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Toni G, Pardey M. The clinical practice of emergency department triage: application of the Australasian triage scale—an extended literature review: part i: evolution of the ATS. Aust Emerg Nurs. 2006;9(4):155–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aenj.2006.09.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Murray M. The Canadian triage and acuity scale: a Canadian perspective on emergency department triage. Emerg Med (Fremantle). 2003;15(1):6–10. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1442-2026.2003.00400.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ebrahimi M, Mirhaghi A, Najafi Z, Shafaee H, Hamechizfahm RM. Are pediatric triage systems reliable in the emergency department? Emerg Med Int. 2020;2020:9825730.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Hurvich CM, Tsai CL. Regression and time series model selection in small samples. Biometrika. 1989;76(2):297–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. 2022. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria; 2022. https://www.R-project.org/

  33. Masarotto G, Varin C. Gaussian Copula Regression in R. J Stat Softw. 2017. https://www.jstatsoft.org/v77/i08/

  34. Kruizinga MD, Peeters D, Veen M van, Houten M van, Wieringa J, Noordzij JG, et al. The impact of lockdown on pediatric ED visits and hospital admissions during the COVID-19 pandemic: a multicenter analysis and review of the literature. Eur J Pediatr. 2021;180(7):2271–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Mataloni F, Colais P, Pinnarelli L, Fusco D, Davoli M. The impact of the SARS COV-2 pandemic on pediatric accesses in ED: a healthcare emergency information system analysis. Plos One. 2022;17(8):e0272569. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0272569.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  36. Lopes S, Soares P, Santos Sousa J, Rocha JV, Boto P, Santana R. Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the frequency of emergency department visits in Portugal: An interrupted time series analysis until July 2021. J Am Coll Emerg Phys Open. 2023;4(1):e12864. https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.12864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Radhakrishnan L, Carey K, Hartnett KP, et al. Pediatric emergency department visits before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic — United States, January 2019–January 2022. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2022;71:313–8. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm7108e1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Cheng CW, Huang YB, Chao HY, Ng CJ, Chen SY. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on pediatric emergency medicine: a systematic review. Medicina (Kaunas). 2022;58(8):1112. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina58081112.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Sands R, Shanmugavadivel D, Stephenson T, et al. Medical problems presenting to paediatric emergency departments: 10 years on. Emerg Med J. 2012;29:379–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Yoong SYC, Ang PH, Chong SL, Ong YG, Zakaria NDB, Lee KP, Pek JH. Common diagnoses among pediatric attendances at emergency departments. BMC Pediatr. 2021;21(1):172. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-021-02646-8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  41. Hartnett KP, Kite-Powell A, DeVies J, Coletta MA, Boehmer TK, Adjemian J, Gundlapalli AV. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on emergency department visits - United States, January 1, 2019-May 30, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2020;69(23):699–704. https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6923e1.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  42. Collivignarelli MC, Abbà A, Bertanza G, Pedrazzani R, Ricciardi P, Carnevale MM. Lockdown for CoViD-2019 in Milan: what are the effects on air quality? Sci Total Environ. 2020;25(732):139280. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139280.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Finkelstein Y, Maguire B, Zemek R, Osmanlliu E, Kam AJ, Dixon A, Desai N, Sawyer S, Emsley J, Lynch T, Mater A, Schuh S, Rumantir M, Freedman SB, Pediatric Emergency Research Canada (PERC). Effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on patient volumes, acuity, and outcomes in pediatric emergency departments: a nationwide study. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2021;37(8):427–34. https://doi.org/10.1097/PEC.0000000000002484.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is part of the PedCov project, which investigates the utilization of pediatric primary and emergency care during the COVID-19 pandemic in Switzerland. The PedCov Consortium consists of the University Children's Hospital Zurich (Michelle Seiler (PI), Michael von Rhein, Aziz Chaouch), the ZHAW Institute of Public Health (Julia Dratva (PI), Michelle Dey, Szilvia Altwicker-Hámori, Thomas Volken, Frank Wieber), clinical partners (Gianluca Gualco, Pediatric Emergency Department, Institute of Pediatrics of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona; Sergio Manzano, Department of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Geneva Children’s Hospital, Geneva University Hospitals, and Faculty of Medicine, University of Geneva) and the Professional Association of Swiss Pediatricians in Private Practice (Kinderärzte Schweiz; Ursula Laasner, Marc Sidler).

Declaration of generative AI and AI-assisted technologies in the writing process

During the preparation of this work no generative AI and AI-assisted technologies were used by the author(s) in the writing process.

Funding

The PedCov-project was partly funded by the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH) (Federal Office of Public Health FOPH (admin.ch)) (number: 142005474; PIs: JD, MS) and partly through institutional contributions of the ZHAW and the University Children’s Hospital Zurich. The FOPH had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Child Development Center, University Children`s Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Michael von Rhein

  2. Department of Epidemiology and Health Systems, Center for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland

    Aziz Chaouch

  3. University Children`S Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Vivian Oros

  4. Pediatric Emergency Department, Geneva University Hospitals, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland

    Sergio Manzano

  5. Pediatric Emergency Departement, Clinics of Pediatrics, Institute of Pediatrics of Southern Switzerland, EOC, Bellinzona, Switzerland

    Gianluca Gualco

  6. Private Practice, Binningen, Switzerland

    Marc Sidler

  7. Private Practice, Winterthur, Switzerland

    Ursula Laasner

  8. School of Health Science, ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences, Winterthur, Switzerland

    Michelle Dey & Julia Dratva

  9. Medical Faculty, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland

    Julia Dratva

  10. Pediatric Emergency Department, University Children`S Hospital Zurich, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland

    Michelle Seiler

Authors
  1. Michael von Rhein
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aziz Chaouch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Vivian Oros
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Sergio Manzano
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Gianluca Gualco
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Marc Sidler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Ursula Laasner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Michelle Dey
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Julia Dratva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Michelle Seiler
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Consortia

on behalf of the PedCov consortium

  • Michelle Seiler
  • , Michael von Rhein
  • , Aziz Chaouch
  • , Julia Dratva
  • , Michelle Dey
  • , Szilvia Altwicker-Hámori
  • , Thomas Volken
  • , Frank Wieber
  • , Gianluca Gualco
  • , Sergio Manzano
  • , Ursula Laasner
  •  & Marc Sidler

Contributions

All authors have contributed significantly to the study (conception and design) and the submitted manuscript. Dr. Seiler is co-principal investigator, provided data and has written the first draft of the manuscript, Dr. von Rhein has edited and adapted the manuscript (especially large parts of the discussion), Dr. Chaouch performed most of the statistical analyses, Dr. Oros did a part of the data acquisition and curation and performed some statistical analyses, Drs. Manzano and Gualco both provided data, and gave valuable feedback to the manuscript from the perspective of the different language regions they represent, Drs. Sidler and Laasner also critically revised the manuscript and gave important feedback from a private practitioner`s perspective, and Dr. Dey and Prof. Dratva both gave valuable input from a the public health perspective. Prof. Dratva furthermore is also co-principal investigator. All authors gave important input throughout the entire process of the study including reviewing and finally approving the manuscript. Each author listed on the manuscript has seen and approved the submission of this version of the manuscript and takes full responsibility for the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael von Rhein.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

The study was planned and conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. The cantonal ethics committee in the Canton of Zurich evaluated and approved the study protocol. A waiver of consent was obtained as only anonymized data were used (Req-2022–01035).

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

von Rhein, M., Chaouch, A., Oros, V. et al. The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on pediatric emergency department utilization in three regions in Switzerland. Int J Emerg Med 17, 64 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-024-00640-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-024-00640-2

Keywords

International Journal of Emergency Medicine

ISSN: 1865-1380

Contact us