Skip to main content

Impact of advanced trauma life support training on 30-day mortality in severely injured patients at a Kenyan tertiary center: a retrospective matched case-control study

Abstract

Introduction

Trauma is a leading cause of mortality worldwide, particularly in low and middle-income countries (LMICs) like Kenya. This study evaluates the impact of Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) training on 30-day mortality outcomes in severely injured patients at a tertiary care center in Kenya.

Methods

A retrospective matched case-control study was conducted at Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi. The study included adult patients (≥ 18 years) with polytrauma (Injury Severity Score [ISS] > 15) from 2011 to 2022. Propensity score matching was used to pair 81 post-ATLS cases with 81 pre-ATLS controls based on age and ISS. Data analysis was performed using R Statistical language (version 4.3.0).

Results

The 30-day mortality rate decreased significantly from 17% (95% CI: 9.4–27.4%) pre-ATLS to 6% (95% CI: 2.0-13.5%) post-ATLS (p = 0.028). No significant differences were found in baseline characteristics between the two groups. Road traffic accidents were the primary cause of trauma in both groups (72% pre-ATLS vs. 78% post-ATLS).

Conclusion

ATLS training significantly reduced 30-day mortality in severely injured patients, demonstrating its effectiveness even in resource-limited settings. Further prospective randomized studies are recommended to confirm these findings and evaluate long-term outcomes.

Introduction

Trauma is a significant contributor to global mortality and morbidity, with over five million deaths annually, comparable to deaths from HIV, malaria, and tuberculosis combined [1]. 90% of injury-related deaths occur in LMICs, including Kenya, where road traffic accidents (RTAs) are the leading cause of trauma, particularly among individuals aged 5–29 [2, 3]. A 2014 study in Kenya reported a 27.6% mortality rate for trauma cases with ISS > 16 [4].

The Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) program, developed by the American College of Surgeons, aims to improve trauma outcomes through standardized care protocols [5]. While ATLS has been widely implemented in high-income countries, its effectiveness in resource-limited settings remains understudied [6].

This study evaluates the impact of ATLS implementation at Aga Khan University Hospital, Nairobi (AKUHN), on 30-day mortality outcomes in severely injured patients. We hypothesized that ATLS training would lead to a significant reduction in mortality among polytrauma patients.

Methodology

Study design and setting

A retrospective matched case-control study was conducted at AKUHN, a tertiary care center in Nairobi, Kenya. The hospital is a major national referral center with a comprehensive emergency/trauma system, including a dedicated in-hospital trauma team.

Participants

The study included adult patients (≥ 18 years) with polytrauma (ISS ≥ 16) from January 2011 to December 2022. Patients were divided into pre-ATLS (2011–2015) and post-ATLS (2017–2022) groups. Exclusion criteria included patients managed outside the ATLS protocol or lacking complete outcome measures.

ATLS training implementation

ATLS training was implemented at AKUHN in 2016, following the standardized curriculum developed by the American College of Surgeons. All emergency department physicians and key trauma team members completed the 2-day course, which included didactic sessions, skill stations, and simulated patient scenarios.

Data collection

Data were extracted from electronic medical records using a standardized form. Variables collected included demographics, mechanism of injury, ISS, Revised Trauma Score (RTS), length of hospital stay, and 30-day mortality.

Sample size and power

A sample size of 162 patients (81 per group) was determined to detect a 15% reduction in mortality with 80% power and a 5% significance level, based on historical data and previous studies [7, 8].

Propensity score matching

Propensity score matching was performed using a nearest-neighbor algorithm to pair 81 post-ATLS cases with 81 pre-ATLS controls based on age and ISS. This method helps reduce selection bias and control for confounding factors.

Statistical analysis

Data analysis was conducted using R Statistical language (version 4.3.0). Descriptive statistics were presented as medians with interquartile ranges for continuous variables and frequencies with percentages for categorical variables. Comparisons between groups were made using Wilcoxon rank-sum test for continuous variables and Pearson’s Chi-squared test for categorical variables. A p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Ethical considerations

The study received approval from the AKUHN Ethics Review Committee (Ref: 2023/ISERC-25). Patient confidentiality was maintained throughout the data collection and analysis process.

Human Ethics and consent to participate declarations: Not applicable.

Results

The study included 162 patients, with 81 in each group. Baseline characteristics, including age, sex, mechanism of injuries, and injury severity, were similar between the groups (Table 1).

Table 1 Baseline characteristics

The 30-day mortality rate decreased significantly from 17% (14/81) in the pre-ATLS group to 6% (5/81) in the post-ATLS group (p = 0.028) (Table 2). The absolute risk reduction was 11% (95% CI: 1.3–20.7%), with a number needed to treat of 9.1 (95% CI: 4.8–76.9) (Table 2).

Table 2 Mortality rates of the pre ATLS vs. Post-ATLS groups

Discussion

This study demonstrates a significant reduction in 30-day mortality following ATLS training implementation at a tertiary care center in Kenya. The decrease in mortality from 17 to 6% is consistent with findings from other studies evaluating the impact of ATLS in various settings [9, 10]. For instance, a study in Rwanda reported a similar reduction in mortality rates following the introduction of ATLS training, highlighting its effectiveness in sub-Saharan Africa [9]. In high-income countries, ATLS has also been associated with improved trauma outcomes, as evidenced by studies showing reductions in preventable mortality rates [10].

The standardized approach of ATLS likely contributed to improved patient outcomes by enhancing the rapid and effective management of critically injured patients. This is particularly important in resource-limited settings where efficient utilization of available resources is crucial.

The implementation of ATLS principles may help address some of the challenges faced in trauma care in these settings, such as limited resources and variability in provider experience.

Our findings support the growing body of evidence suggesting that structured trauma care protocols can significantly improve outcomes in LMICs. For example, a systematic review found that trauma training programs, including ATLS, are effective in improving knowledge and skills, though the translation into improved patient outcomes varies [11]. Additionally, studies in LMICs have shown that trauma training courses tailored to local contexts can be cost-effective and sustainable, although challenges remain in scaling these programs [8].

However, several limitations of this study should be considered:

  1. 1.

    The retrospective nature of the study introduces potential for bias and confounding factors.

  2. 2.

    As a single-center study, the results may not be generalizable to all settings in LMICs.

  3. 3.

    We were unable to account for potential improvements in hospital resources or other systemic changes over time that may have influenced outcomes.

  4. 4.

    The study focused on 30-day mortality and did not evaluate other important outcomes such as morbidity, functional status, or quality of life.

  5. 5.

    Additional data on changes in care processes, such as the use of blood transfusions, tourniquets, and chest tubes, would have supported the conclusions on the impact of ATLS training.

Future research should address these limitations through prospective, multi-center studies that evaluate a broader range of outcomes. Additionally, cost-effectiveness analyses would be valuable in determining the feasibility of widespread ATLS implementation in resource-limited settings.

Conclusion

ATLS training significantly reduced 30-day mortality in severely injured patients at a tertiary care center in Kenya. This study supports the implementation of standardized trauma care protocols in resource-limited settings to improve patient outcomes. Further research, including prospective randomized studies, is recommended to validate these findings and explore the long-term impact of ATLS training on trauma care in LMICs.

Data availability

No datasets were generated or analysed during the current study.

Abbreviations

ATLS:

Advanced Trauma Life Support

ISS:

Injury Severity Score

RTS:

Revised Trauma Score

eCDF:

empirical cumulative distribution function

GCS:

Glasgow Coma Scale

References

  1. Haagsma JA, Graetz N, Bolliger I, et al. The global burden of injury: incidence, mortality, disability-adjusted life years and time trends from the Global Burden of Disease study 2013. Inj Prev. 2016;22(1):3–18. https://doi.org/10.1136/injuryprev-2015-041616.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. World Health Organization. Global Status Report on Road Safety 2018. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Botchey IM Jr, Hung YW, Bachani AM, et al. Epidemiology and outcomes of injuries in Kenya: a multisite surveillance study. Surgery. 2017;162(6S):S45–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.surg.2017.01.030.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Saidi H, Mutiso BK, Ogengo J. Mortality after road traffic crashes in a system with limited trauma data capability. J Trauma Manag Outcomes. 2014;8:4. https://doi.org/10.1186/1752-2897-8-4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma. Advanced Trauma Life Support (ATLS) Student Course Manual. 10th ed. Chicago, IL: American College of Surgeons; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Jayaraman S, Sethi D, Wong R. Advanced training in trauma life support for ambulance crews. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;8CD003109. https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003109.pub3.

  7. Ali J, Adam R, Butler AK, et al. Trauma outcome improves following the advanced trauma life support program in a developing country. J Trauma. 1993;34(6):890–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/00005373-199306000-00022.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. van Olden GD, Meeuwis JD, Bolhuis HW, Boxma H, Goris RJ. Clinical impact of advanced trauma life support. Am J Emerg Med. 2004;22(7):522–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajem.2004.08.013.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang P, Li NP, Gu YF, et al. Comparison of severe trauma care effect before and after advanced trauma life support training. Chin J Traumatol. 2010;13(6):341–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hashmi ZG, Haider AH, Zafar SN, et al. Hospital-based trauma quality improvement initiatives: first step toward improving trauma outcomes in the developing world. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2013;75(1):60–8. https://doi.org/10.1097/TA.0b013e31829880a0.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Mock C, Juillard C, Brundage S, Goosen J, Joshipura M. Guidelines for trauma quality improvement programmes. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There was no funding for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

C.K.,A.A and E.M. wrote the main manuscript text and prepared Tables 1 and 2 I.C. reviewed the methodology and statistical analysis All authors reviewed the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edwin Mogere.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

This study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

The Aga Khan Univeristy Hospital-Nairobi Institutional Ethics Comitte (IIRC) approved this study.

Consent to participate

Not applicable.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if you modified the licensed material. You do not have permission under this licence to share adapted material derived from this article or parts of it. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamau, C., Chikophe, I., Abdallah, A. et al. Impact of advanced trauma life support training on 30-day mortality in severely injured patients at a Kenyan tertiary center: a retrospective matched case-control study. Int J Emerg Med 17, 153 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-024-00713-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-024-00713-2