Skip to main content

Advertisement

Are pre-existing psychiatric disorders the only reason for involuntary holds in the emergency department?

Abstract

Objectives

To determine the role of previous psychiatric disorders including substance use disorders on emergency department (ED) patients on involuntary holds and compare presentations, treatment, and outcomes based on cause.

Methods

We conducted a retrospective study of patients ≥ 18 years old on involuntary holds in the ED of a tertiary care center from January 1, 2013, to November 30, 2015. Demographic and clinical information were collected. Those with and without prior psychiatric disorder including substance use disorder were compared.

Results

We identified 251 patients of which 129 (51.4%) had a psychiatric disorder, 23 (9.2%) had a substance use disorder, and 86 (34.3%) had both. Thirteen patients (5.2%) had no psychiatric disorder or substance use disorder and the majority 10 (76.9%) were on involuntary holds due to suicidal threats related to pain or another medical problem. Patients without a psychiatric or substance use disorder were older (55 years [17.8] vs 42 [19]; P = 0.01), more likely to be married (10 [76.9%] vs 64 [26.9%]; P < 0.001), and had more medical comorbidities (10 [76.9%] vs 114 [47.9%]; P = 0.049) compared with those without a psychiatric or substance use disorder.

Conclusion

Patients on involuntary holds most commonly have pre-existing psychiatric disorder including substance use disorder. Patients on involuntary holds without history of psychiatric disorder often have severe pain or other active medical conditions which may contribute to suicidal thoughts. Addressing these underlying medical issues may be crucial in preventing further psychiatric decompensation.

Introduction

Involuntary holds are commonly placed by emergency physicians and are often associated with longer emergency department (ED) length of stay [1, 2]. Much of what is known about involuntary holds comes from studies of patients admitted to psychiatric units for exacerbation of their ongoing psychiatric disorder including substance use disorder. Approximately 40% of patients with psychiatric disorder in the USA are untreated [3], and not uncommonly, these patients experience a mental health crisis requiring an emergency involuntary hold. Studies show that the majority of involuntarily committed patients have more severe psychiatric illness, including psychotic disorders, especially schizophrenia, higher rates of assaultive behaviors prior to admission, and lack of treatment adherence [4, 5].

While prior psychiatric disorder is typically associated with involuntary hold, there are other less common reasons for involuntary holds in the ED in patients with no prior psychiatric disorder. For example, patients with severe behavioral disturbances associated with cognitive impairment from dementia or other medical conditions may require an emergency involuntary hold. Every state in the USA and District of Columbia have laws that allow health care providers to revoke the civil liberties of patients suspected of having mental health problems who are unwilling or unable to seek care and may pose a danger to self or others [6]. These laws are meant to protect the patient and society from unintended consequences of untreated conditions that produce verbal or behavioral threats of violence. In Florida, the Baker Act provides for a 72-h emergency hold on patients with suspected mental illness posing a danger to self or others and refusing or lacking capacity to consent for care.

With the number of involuntary patients being seen in the ED increasing [7], it is important to understand the clinical and demographic characteristics of these patients in order to provide effective and efficient care. The objectives of this study are to determine the role of previous psychiatric disorder including substance use disorder on patients in the ED of an acute care hospital on involuntary holds and compare demographic and clinical presentations, treatment, and outcomes based on cause.

Materials and methods

This retrospective chart review study, deemed exempt by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board, was conducted at a suburban academic tertiary care center in Florida that also serves the community and has an annual ED volume of 27,305 patient visits. Adults 18 years and older presenting or placed on involuntary holds in the ED from January 1, 2013, through November 30, 2015, were included in this study. If a patient had multiple admissions during the study period, only the first admission was included. Specific demographic information collected included age, race, sex, marital status, housing, and payer source. Clinical data collected included reason for involuntary holds, prior psychiatric or substance use disorders, suicide attempts, medical condition, violence in the ED, length of stay (LOS), disposition, and 30-day readmission.

Study data were collected and managed using REDCap (Research Electronic Data Capture) [8]. REDCap is a secure, web-based application designed to support data capture for research studies, providing (1) an intuitive interface for validated data entry, (2) audit trails for tracking data manipulation and export procedures, (3) automated export procedures for seamless data downloads to common statistical packages, and (4) procedures for importing data from external sources.

Standard descriptive statistics were used for patient demographics and clinical factors. The two patient cohorts were compared using the χ2 test and Fisher exact test to evaluate categorical variables and Wilcoxon rank sum test to evaluate continuous variables. P less than or equal to .05 was considered statistically significant. All statistical analyses were performed using the SAS version 9.3 software (SAS Institute Inc).

Results

There were 278 patients on involuntary holds during the study period. Eleven were readmissions during the study period and were excluded leaving 267 unique patients. Sixteen were excluded because of age less than 18 leaving 251 patients in the study population. Of the 251 patients studied, only 13 patients were found to have no prior history of psychiatric disorder. Univariate analyses of patient demographics are shown in Table 1. Patients without a psychiatric or substance use disorder were older (median age, 55 vs 42 years; P = .01) and were more likely to be married (76.9% vs 26.9%; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in gender, race, housing status, or payer status (Table 1).

Table 1 Demographics of patients with psychiatric disorder or substance abuse

Of the 251 patients, 129 (51.4%) had a psychiatric disorder, 23 (9.2%) had only substance use disorder, 86 (34.3%) had both substance use and psychiatric disorders, and 13 (5.2%) had no prior history of psychiatric or substance use disorders. Univariate analyses of patient clinical characteristics were performed, and patients without a psychiatric or substance use disorder were found to have significantly more medical problems (76.9% vs 47.9%; P = .05). There was no significant difference in whether the patient demonstrated violent behavior in the ED, had suicidal or homicidal ideation, frequency of serum alcohol and urine drug testing, ED LOS, ED discharge disposition, whether the involuntary hold was removed in the ED, 30-day readmissions, or if the patient required hospital admission (Table 2).

Table 2 Characteristics of patients with psychiatric disorder including substance abuse

Of those 13 patients without a psychiatric disorder, 4 (30.8%) showed self-harming behaviors (3 overdosed, 1 had a self-inflicted wound). Three patients (23.1%) presented with psychotic symptoms (delusions): 1 was tapering opiates; 1 had persecutory delusions in the setting of altered mental status; and 1 had persecutory delusions worsening over several months in the setting of abdominal pain, chronic menorrhagia, and thyroid disease. The remaining 6 patients reported suicidal ideations in the setting of pain or a significant medical condition (Table 3).

Table 3 Demographic and clinical variables of patients without history including psychiatric or substance use disorders

Of those 13 patients without a psychiatric disorder, 10 (76.9%) had a documented previous medical comorbidity. All 13 patients presented to the ED with a recent or acute medical problem. Seven of the 13 patients (53.8%) reported pain as their major medical problem: 2 patients had back pain, 1 had abdominal pain related to chronic menorrhagia, 1 had flank pain after nephrectomy due to cancer, and 3 patients had neuropathic pain. Of the remaining 6 patients, 1 had brain surgery, 1 had a brain tumor, 1 was septic in the setting of chronic kidney disease, 1 had a self-inflicted wound, 1 had severe asthma, and 1 had recently overdosed after receiving a court sentence. Six patients (46.2%) were placed on involuntary hold in the ED, and 7 (53.8%) prior to arrival in the ED. The most common reason for involuntary hold was suicidal ideation in 10 patients (76.9%), which 5 (38.5%) attributed to pain. Psychosis was present in the remaining 3 patients (Table 1).

Discussion

To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the underlying reasons for involuntary holds on patients in the ED while examining the differences between those with and without psychiatric disorder including substance use disorder. One of the major findings was that 95% of involuntary hold patients in the ED had a psychiatric disorder. This finding emphasizes the importance of having ED staff trained in recognizing and treating acute psychiatric illnesses. Having access to a clinical psychiatrist may be crucial in order to expedite proper diagnosis and avoid delay in therapy. Likewise, recognizing and reversing the effects of substance abuse remain a critical part of ED care in this patient population.

We found that only a small percentage of patients (5%) did not have a prior history of psychiatric disorder. This group of 13 patients had significantly more medical comorbidities (76.9% vs 47.9%), and all had an active medical problem upon presentation to the ED, underscoring the importance of having well-trained staff and an adequate infrastructure in order to deliver proper medical care to a patient population that by definition poses a threat to self or others (involuntary holds). Comorbid medical conditions are a known source of psychological distress [9], especially when the comorbid condition is producing pain and the association between chronic disease and depression is well established [10]. Further, many long-term care patients often have behavioral health disorders related to chronic medical conditions [11]. We found that none of the 13 patients acted out violently, which may reflect intermittent psychological distress as a consequence of medical comorbidity and not behavior associated with substance use or other chronic psychiatric disorder. It is also possible that even though the patient’s involuntary status may suggest a true unwillingness to receive care, some of these patients are willing to cooperate once in the ED; clinicians should continue their involuntary status given the risks associated with recent disclosure of suicidal ideations in order to guarantee a safe environment for care, rather than leaving this highly important endeavor and risk up to the patient. Seven of these patients (53.8%) presented to the ED voluntarily, which underscores the importance of having staff trained to recognize safety concerns in patients who may not otherwise be at risk for a mental health crisis.

In over half of these patients (53.8%), the active problem involved ongoing pain. It was the uncontrolled medical problems and pain that contributed to development of suicidal ideations and/or attempts in the majority of the patients. In fact, in more than one third of these patients, suicide was reported as a means to end physical suffering. This finding may have implications in terms of better addressing pain in the medically ill population in order to prevent hopelessness and helplessness that often lead to suicidal ideations. Pain is a known risk factor for mental health problems, including suicidal ideation [12], and comorbid medical conditions have been reported as a significant risk factor for suicide [13]. Pain is also a recognized risk factor for depression, which reinforces the case for possible undiagnosed depression affecting this patient population and the need to screen medical populations for depressive symptoms [14].

Additional information found on the patients without a history of psychiatric disorder were that they were older, more likely to be married, and had more medical comorbidities than those who did. This cohort appeared socioeconomically and psychologically more stable; nevertheless, these patients similarly suffered a mental health crisis. Gender, race, housing status, payer status, and presence of suicidal or homicidal ideations were not different between this group and those with psychiatric or substance abuse problems. This may suggest that patients presenting to the ED on emergency holds without having psychiatric disorders or substance abuse are more homogeneous than different to patients with mental health or substance abuse, raising important points. Traditionally, risk of harm to self or others has been attributed to psychiatric patients or those with specifically substance abuse problems, but given these findings, all patients admitted on involuntary holds carried a similar risk of harm. Important implications of these findings could suggest the need to review safety policies and infrastructure for all emergency personnel who cares for patients on involuntary holds, independently of their mental health or substance abuse status.

Limitations

As this is a retrospective study, there are inherent limitations. These include inconsistencies in reporting of prior history of psychiatric disorder including substance use disorder. Also, this study was conducted at a single site in a suburban location with a more ethnically homogeneous patient population than an intercity hospital in a large, metropolitan area, which limits generalizability of our findings. Education and employment information was not included in the medical record for a number of patients, which limited our ability to use these variables in our analysis. Cohorts were not compared with respect to ED diagnostic work-up and treatment. We were unable to review medical records of patients transferred for inpatient psychiatric care; consequently, final disposition and diagnostic determinations were unknown. Finally, although not unexpected, the small number of patients without a history of psychiatric or substance use disorder limited our ability to show an association between demographic and clinical variables and involuntary hold.

Conclusions

Patients on involuntary holds most commonly have a prior history of psychiatric disorder including substance use disorder. The majority of patients who did not have history of psychiatric disorder were suicidal in the setting of pain and other medical conditions. This may represent a growing population as our society ages and more people have devastating medical conditions. Consequently, as more people come to ED, providers may increasingly encounter medically ill patients with severe psychiatric symptoms warranting involuntary holds. It is imperative these patients first undergo comprehensive evaluation to stabilize and/or treat medical problems before referral for inpatient psychiatric treatment.

Availability of data and materials

All datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. 1.

    Wilson MP, Brennan JJ, Modesti L, et al. Lengths of stay for involuntarily held psychiatric patients in the ED are affected by both patient characteristics and medication use. Am J Emerg Med. 2015;33(4):527–30.

  2. 2.

    Rhodes SM, Patanwala AE, Cremer JK, et al. Predictors of prolonged length of stay and adverse events among older adults with behavioral health-related emergency department visits: a systematic medical record review. J Emerg Med. 2016;50(1):143–52.

  3. 3.

    Bijl RV, de Graaf R, Hiripi E, et al. The prevalence of treated and untreated mental disorders in five countries. Health Aff (Millwood). 2003;22(3):122–33.

  4. 4.

    Nicholson RA. Correlates of commitment status in psychiatric patients. Psychol Bull. 1986;100(2):241–50.

  5. 5.

    Craw J, Compton MT. Characteristics associated with involuntary versus voluntary legal status at admission and discharge among psychiatric inpatients. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2006;41(12):981–8.

  6. 6.

    Hedman LC, Petrila J, Fisher WH, Swanson JW, Dingman DA, Burris S. State laws on emergency holds for mental health stabilization. Psychiatr Serv. 2016;67(5):529–35.

  7. 7.

    Brennaman L. Exceeding the legal time limits for involuntary mental health examinations: a study of emergency department delays. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2015;16(3–4):67–78.

  8. 8.

    Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap)--a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009;42(2):377–81.

  9. 9.

    Shih M, Simon PA. Health-related quality of life among adults with serious psychological distress and chronic medical conditions. Qual Life Res. 2008;17(4):521–8.

  10. 10.

    Patten SB, Williams JV, Lavorato DH, et al. Patterns of association of chronic medical conditions and major depression. Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2018;27(1):42–50

  11. 11.

    Gabrel CS, Jones A. The National Nursing Home Survey: 1997 summary. Vital Health Stat 13. 2000;(147):1–121.

  12. 12.

    Hooten WM. Chronic pain and mental health disorders: shared neural mechanisms, epidemiology, and treatment. Mayo Clin Proc. 2016;91(7):955–70.

  13. 13.

    Druss B, Pincus H. Suicidal ideation and suicide attempts in general medical illnesses. Arch Intern Med. 2000;160(10):1522–6.

  14. 14.

    Breivik H, Reme SE, Linton SJ. High risk of depressoin and suicide attment among chronic pain patients: always explore catastrophizing and suicide thoughts when evaluating chronic pain patients. Scand J Pain. 2014;5(1):1–3.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Not applicable.

Funding

The authors acknowledge the Center for Clinical and Translational Science grant support (UL1 TR000135) in publications relating to this project. This publication was also supported by NIH/NCRR Colorado CTSI Grant Number UL1 RR025780. Its contents are the authors’ sole responsibility and do not necessarily represent official NIH views.

Author information

CL participated in the study design, data collection, and manual preparation. MM participated in the study design, data collection, manual preparation, and submission. TV participated in the data analysis and manual preparation. ND participated in the study design, data analysis, and manual preparation. TR participated in the study design, data analysis, and manual preparation. AR participated in the data analysis and manual preparation. LH participated in the data collection and statistical analysis. MB participated in the study design, data collection, data analysis, and manual preparation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Correspondence to Michael J. Maniaci.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was reviewed and approved by the Mayo Clinic Institutional Review Board.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lachner, C., Maniaci, M.J., Vadeboncoeur, T.F. et al. Are pre-existing psychiatric disorders the only reason for involuntary holds in the emergency department?. Int J Emerg Med 13, 4 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12245-020-0265-4

Download citation

Keywords

  • Involuntary hold
  • Psychiatric hold